Pages

Showing posts with label Austria. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Austria. Show all posts

1939: Austria

Austria, the former Empire of the Hapsburgs, and after 1918 an independent republic, was reduced in March 1938 to the status of an integral part of the German Reich. At that time Austria represented an area of 32,369 square miles with a population of 6,760,233, according to the census of March 22, 1933. The name of Austria was in 1938 changed into Ostmark. The incorporation of Austria into Germany aggravated two of the outstanding problems created by National Socialism for Germany, the Catholics and the Jews. The number of Catholics in Austria in 1934 was 6,116,250, or more than 90 per cent of the population. The Catholic Church had always been very influential in Austria; it counted there the two archbishoprics of Vienna and Salzburg and four bishoprics. The Concordat between the Vatican and Austria had been especially advantageous to the former. By the inclusion of Austria, and later of Czechoslovakia, the number of Catholics within greater Germany equalled that of Protestants, whereas formerly the Catholics had formed not quite a third of the German population. The number of Jews in Austria was given by the census of 1934 as 191,481, of whom practically all lived in Vienna, a city where the Jews formed more than ten per cent of the population and participated in an active and important way in the cultural and economic life. The number of persons who had some Jewish blood and came therefore under the Nuremberg racial laws was, however, considerably larger than the figure given above. This aggravation of the Catholic and Jewish problems led to an intensification of anti-Catholic and especially of anti-Jewish measures of the National Socialist Government. Whereas the situation of the Jews had, until the beginning of 1938, been somewhat tolerable, in Germany after the annexation of Austria it became completely unbearable. The ferociousness of the Nazi treatment of the Jews made itself felt even more in Austria than in Germany.

'Liquidation' of Austria.

At the beginning, a part of the Austrian population had welcomed the National Socialist occupation and had expected from it a considerable amelioration of its economic situation. These expectations were in no way fulfilled. One of the main reasons of complaint for the Austrian population was the fact that the native Austrian National Socialists were removed from leading positions, and that all important jobs were given to National Socialists coming from Germany. This tendency found its final consummation in the dismissal of the National Socialist Gauleiter, or district leader, of Vienna, Odilo Globocnik, at the end of January. He was replaced by Mr. Burckel who had been up to then the Reichskommissar for the reunion of Austria with the Reich, and who now assumed both positions. By the beginning of February all Austrian social and political life was completely coordinated. Of the existing 115,000 different associations and organizations, most of them of a purely non-political character, only 5,000 were allowed to remain. All others were dissolved and their property, more than 2,000,000,000 marks, confiscated. Among them were the former Austrian trade unions which had 435,000 members altogether and a property of about 50,000,000 marks. March 13, the day of the occupation of Austria by German troops, was declared a public holiday and first celebrated officially in 1939. A further step in the 'liquidation' of Austria and the Austrian tradition was taken at the end of April. All central offices for the former Austria, which still maintained a certain unity under Seyss-Inquart as Reichsstaathalter for the Ostmark, were closed. Austria, or Ostmark, was nothing more than a geographic term. It was divided for administrative purposes into seven Gane, or districts, which were directly subordinated to the central government in Berlin.

Anti-Catholic Measures.

At the same time the struggle against the Catholic Church was intensified. In January 1939 complete inventories were taken of all the property, including libraries and pictures, belonging to monasteries and religious foundations. Government commissioners were appointed to control the properties and financial administration of the larger monasteries. Religious schools were closed, and many of the buildings turned over to National Socialist organizations or the army for use as barracks. On May 12, authorities of the Catholic Church were notified that in the future all changes in the personnel of the clergy would be subject to the approval of the National Socialist Party. A list of candidates for parish priests as well as for higher dignitaries had to be submitted to the Party authorities, who also reserve for themselves the right to pass on candidates for theological schools or religious orders. The Catholic Church was further offended by the passing of a law legalizing the cremation, which, under the former regime, had been forbidden in accordance with the teachings of the church. On May 17 one of the largest and richest monasteries in Austria, the famous Klosterneuburg, near Vienna, was forced to cede all its agricultural estates to the National Socialist Government. At the end of May the residential palace of Archbishop Sigismund Waits of Salzburg was confiscated and occupied by the Hitler Elite Guard. Archbishop Waitz, who was appointed to this historically most important see in 1935, had already been the object of Nazi displeasure, as in October 1938 when some of the windows in the palace were smashed by demonstrators and when he was deprived of the privilege of supervising religious education in the elementary schools of the Salzburg district. Originally the Archbishop of Vienna, Cardinal Theodor Innitzer, who had at first warmly welcomed Hitler's occupation of Vienna, fared somewhat better at the hands of the new authorities, but in October 1938 his palace in Vienna was attacked and sacked by a mob. At the beginning of July 1939, he was forced to abandon a diocesan tour after several attacks by Nazi crowds in which he only barely escaped being knocked down. The worst demonstrations occurred at Konigsbrunn, twenty-five miles from Vienna, where the Cardinal had preached a sermon on peace and was attacked on leaving the church.

The Vatican showed itself most concerned with the situation of the Austrian Catholics. The Austrian Concordat, which had been concluded in 1934 by the Austrian Chancellor Engelbert Dollfuss, was considered by the German Government to have expired from the time of the annexation of Austria. Accordingly the Government immediately repudiated the financial obligations to the clergy which the former Austrian Government had assumed under the Concordat. The Vatican, however, considered the Concordat still in force. In August Pope Pius instructed the Papal Nuncio at Berlin, Mgr. Cesare Orsenigo, to confer with the German Government on the question of whether it regarded Austria now included in the German Concordat, which incidentally had also been repeatedly violated by the German Government. The outbreak of war at the beginning of September put an end to the negotiations. The Austrian population on the whole welcomed the war against Poland, but was greatly disturbed at the war against Great Britain and France, and bore the ensuing grave privations not without increasing complaints.

Anti-Semitic Measures.

The situation of the Jews in Vienna became immediately more desperate than that of the Jews in the older parts of Nazi Germany, and the treatment of them surpassed in brutality even that in Germany. All measures were taken to enforce a quick emigration of Jews from Austria. The small number of Jews outside Vienna were forced into the city. At the end of 1939, the Jews who had not then succeeded in emigrating were threatened with deportation to the newly established reservation in Eastern Poland. See also RELIGION: Jews.

Restoration of the Hapsburgs.

Meanwhile the hope for the restoration of an independent Austria was not given up. Groups of Austrian emigrés in France and in the United States continued to insist upon Austria's right to self-determination. Archduke Otto of Hapsburgs, the son of the last Emperor, maintained his claims to the Austrian crown. Prime Minister Daladier of France included in one of his addresses the restoration of Austria as one of the possible results of the present European war. Plans were discussed for the recreation of a Central European Federation with Vienna as its capital, and perhaps with the Hapsburg as a visible rallying point for the different nationalities which would join, on a footing of complete equality and with all the guarantees of progressive democracy, such a federation for mutual protection and economic cooperation. It was understood that an effort was made to arouse the sympathy of the Vatican and of the Italian government for such a plan. Other plans foresaw the formation of a large southern German Catholic State under Hapsburg leadership and with Vienna as its center. The present war has reopened the problem of the future of Central Europe and of a form of government which would most likely insure the peaceful collaboration, the free development and the economic progress of the several nationalities living in the Danubian basin and the surrounding territories. It is not improbable that if such a reorganization should take place. Austria may be once more destined to play her traditional role in the center of Europe.

1938: Austria

After an independent existence of about one thousand years, during which time she had formed the center of a great empire, Austria ceased her existence in 1938 and became an integral part of Great Germany, entirely assimilated to its structure and civilization. Under the rule of the Habsburg Dynasty, Austria had fulfilled the important function of uniting politically, economically, and culturally, the countries of the Danubian basin, and of serving as a bulwark, first against Turkey, later, against Russian and German expansion. After the World War, the German portion of the former Habsburg Monarchy, remaining as an independent federal republic, was torn by internal struggles between the Social Democratic Labor Party, which dominated in Vienna and in the large industrial centers, and the Catholic Clerical Party, which prevailed in the agrarian districts. Finally, this struggle was decided in 1934 by the victory of the Clericals under Dr. Dollfuss. He could, he hoped, with the help of Fascist Italy, maintain his regime against the onslaught of the National Socialists, but he fell a victim to their murderous attacks in July 1934. His successor, Kurt Schuschnigg, followed, as Chancellor, the course of an authoritarian Catholic regime.

Habsburg Restoration Considered.

The sympathies of the regime and of a large part of the population inclined toward the restoration of the Habsburg Monarchy. In November 1937, the twenty-fifth birthday of the Habsburg Prince Otto, the pretender to the throne, was used for a demonstration by the Legitimists, the adherents of a Habsburg restoration. Dr. Schuschnigg, however, wished to proceed very cautiously so as not to endanger the security of Austria by a Habsburg restoration. He knew that the German Nazi regime was violently opposed to such restoration. Mussolini, who at first favored such a restoration and who had supported a marriage between Prince Otto and an Italian Princess, changed his position toward the end of 1937. He turned to close cooperation with Nazi Germany; and the formation of the Rome-Berlin Axis weakened the position of Schuschnigg in Austria and the chances of a Habsburg restoration.

German Nazi Pressure.

German policy became more aggressive with the nomination of Von Ribbentrop as German Foreign Minister on Feb. 4, 1938. The Austrian Government found documents which established beyond doubt the existence of detailed preparations for a coup d'etat by the Austrian National Socialists who intended to start a revolt and to seize the reins of power, inspired and supported by Nazi Germany. The agreement of July 11, 1936, between Germany and Austria had established the basis for greater cooperation between the two German-speaking countries. But now Germany pressed for Austria's complete adherence to the line of German foreign policy. This, Chancellor Schuschnigg refused to consider. He was eager for friendly relations with the Rome-Berlin axis, but at the same time he wished to preserve close contact with the Western democracies and with the countries of the Little Entente. Von Ribbentrop, however, wished Austria to leave the League of Nations, join the Anti-Comintern Pact, and definitely throw in her lot with Germany, Italy and Japan and their aggressive designs.

Berchtesgaden Interview of Schuschnigg with Chancellor Hitler.

It was under these conditions that Dr. Schuschnigg accepted an urgent invitation by Chancellor Hitler to come to Berchtesgaden on Feb. 12. Schuschnigg accepted under pressure of the pro-Nazi elements in his entourage, and intended to complain to Chancellor Hitler about the plans for a Nazi revolt which had been discovered in Austria. In the interview at Berchtesgaden, besides the two Chancellors, the two Foreign Ministers, Von Ribbentrop and Guido Schmidt, and the German Ambassador in Vienna, Von Papen, participated. It lasted for about twelve hours and was marked by an icy atmosphere of complete lack of cordiality. Chancellor Hitler did not wish to listen to Chancellor Schuschnigg's complaints and demanded, in a most aggressive tone, the complete subjugation of Austria to Germany's policies. Chancellor Schuschnigg declined to agree, but promised to introduce some pro-Nazi leaders of Austria into his Cabinet, and to allow and legalize in Austria, within limits, the Nazi Party and its activities.

Concessions to Hitler; Cabinet Reorganization.

These concessions to the National Socialists were fought by the Legitimists, by most of the Catholics, and especially by the workers who, together, represented a majority of the Austrian population. They pointed out that no concession to the Austrian Nazis could be satisfactory, because the Nazis were out for the liquidation of Austria and her unconditional absorption into Germany. Chancellor Schuschnigg followed the course which had taken him to Berchtesgaden, and refused to cooperate with the working class and its representatives, a gesture which would have strengthened his regime. He agreed to a reconstruction of his Cabinet, and accepted as Minister of the Interior, a member of the National Socialist Party, Arthur Seyss-Inquart, whom he thought to be personally loyal to him but who soon openly favored the fast-growing Nazi influence in Austria. As Minister of the Interior he became head of the entire police forces and responsible for internal security and order. These functions until then had been under the direct supervision of Chancellor Schuschnigg. At the same time, amnesty was granted to leading National Socialists in Austria who had been sentenced for attacks against the existing regime. Thus, under threat of a German ultimatum and conscious that no help would come forth from Italy or from the Western Powers, Austria had to permit German interference in her internal affairs. She hoped to get in exchange an unconditional declaration by Chancellor Hitler, in his forthcoming speech of Feb. 20, that he would respect Austria's independence and integrity.

The new German diplomacy under Von Ribbentrop had scored its first success, employing the methods of military pressure and threat of action if demands were not accepted. Although Chancellor Schuschnigg agreed to only a small part of the original German demands, nevertheless, this first concession opened the way to further interference in Austria's affairs. Whereas Schuschnigg intended his concessions as a definite settlement which might lead to appeasement and to cooperation, the Germans regarded them only as the first stage on the road which was fast to be followed by further demands. The new Minister, Seyss-Inquart, left Vienna immediately after his appointment and went to Berlin to consult with the official German authorities. The German press clamored for the complete coordination of Austria with Nazi Germany.

Inaction of Western Democracies.

Under these circumstances it became clear that the decisive moment in the struggle for the independence of Austria was approaching. Much depended upon the attitude of the Western democracies. Although in France some of the leading publicists warned of the imminent dangers, the British and the French Governments remained inactive and pursued a policy of facile optimism. In the light of further events, the words of some of the French publicists seem almost prophetic. Wladimir D'Ormesson asked on Feb. 17: 'Are things evolving as though the Western powers didn't exist? Do they admit the policy of ultimatums? Does a European balance of power still exist? It does not suffice that Great Britain and France stand together: they must also have a firm line of policy.' And Bure wrote on the same day: 'Let us not confuse cold-bloodedness with lack of decision. The peoples of Central Europe will look in the future to Berlin instead of to London and Paris. The day is not far-distant when Hitler will invite the French and British Governments to Berchtesgaden, to accept the new European order created by the will of the Führer.' The annexation of Austria by military force, which was to follow within a month after the interview at Berchtesgaden, created not only the first great success of the new aggressive diplomacy of Von Ribbentrop in cooperation with the German army, it also definitely opened the road which was to lead to the Pact of Munich.

The Sovereignty of Austria.

The independence of Austria had been solemnly assured in a joint declaration of Great Britain, France and Italy, issued on Feb. 17, 1934, and repeated on Sept. 27 of the same year. On April 14, 1935, the conference of the three Powers at Stresa reaffirmed their determination to maintain the integrity of Austria. The proposed conference on Austria and on the affairs of Central Europe which was to be convened at Rome in May 1935, was never realized because of the diverging interests of the Great Powers and the countries of the Little Entente. Chancellor Hitler tried to allay any apprehension by solemnly declaring, on May 21, 1935, that 'Germany has neither the intention nor the will to interfere with the internal affairs of Austria, nor to annex Austria or achieve union with her.' In the same declaration Hitler promised to respect the demilitarization of the Rhineland and to fulfill the Pact of Locarno for which he had high words of praise.

Less than a year later, on March 7, 1936, he broke the Pact of Locarno, remilitarized the Rhineland, and, under these changed circumstances, Austria was forced to agree to a bilateral pact with Germany which was achieved on July 11, 1936. Its first article declared that the German Government recognized, in the sense of the words of the Führer of May 21, 1935, the full sovereignty of Austria. In the second article, both governments declared that they regarded the internal policy exclusively as a question of each country upon which the other countries should exercise no direct or indirect influence. The next day, on July 12, Italy definitely turned away from London and Paris and the Locarno Pact. The visit of Count Ciano, in October 1936, to Berlin and Berchtesgaden marked the beginning of the close German-Italian cooperation, for which Mussolini introduced the name of the Rome-Berlin axis. With this changed Italian attitude, Austria lost the important backing of Italy against German penetration. The modus vivendi created by the bilateral pact of July 11, 1936, was frequently disturbed by the fact that against the wording of the Locarno Pact the German Government supported again and again the Austrian National Socialists in their actions against the constituted Austrian Government. In February 1938 the German Government believed the hour had come to interfere openly in the internal affairs of Austria.

Schuschnigg's Speech in Parliament.

The speech of Chancellor Hitler on Feb. 20, 1938, avoided any clear reference to the sovereignty of Austria. On the contrary, the words used revealed clearly the decision of the German Government not to be satisfied with the concessions made so far by Chancellor Schuschnigg, but to insist on the 'protection' of the Germans in Austria. Hitler's speech was answered by Chancellor Schuschnigg in a great speech which he delivered before the Austrian Parliament on Feb. 24. In this speech he declared that the Austrian Government would preserve, with all its power, the integrity of Austria and the traditions of her civilization. He stressed that there was no question of going beyond the concessions which he had already made. Proudly he could point to the great economic progress accomplished by Austria during the past five years. Exports had risen from 818 million schillings in 1933 to 1230 million schillings in 1937. Production had shown an all-round increase. Taking the production of the year 1929 as 100, the production of 1933 had amounted to 62, the production of 1937, to 104. The production of pig-iron had risen from 88,000 tons in 1933 to 389,000 in the year 1937, the production of steel in the same period, from 226,000 tons to 650,000 tons. A similar rise could be noticed in the production of celluloid, paper, and cotton yarn. The production of oil increased from 855 metric tons in 1933 to 33,000 metric tons in 1937. An intensification of agriculture increased the production of wheat by 170 per cent, of potatoes by 430 per cent, of sugar by about 1100 per cent. The increased tourist traffic brought large revenues to the hotel industry and to the railways. The number of unemployed had been reduced to 232,000, without resorting to heavy armaments as other countries had done. The standard of living had been raised throughout Austria, roads, and large housing schemes were under construction. The Austrian budget, which was regularly published and publicly controlled, was completely balanced. Foreign debt had been reduced during the past five years by more than half. Gold reserves of the Austrian National Bank had been considerably increased. The severe restrictions upon exchange had been very much relaxed, so that Austria could claim the most liberal financial administration in Central Europe.

At the same time Chancellor Schuschnigg also stressed his willingness to cooperate with the workers. Everybody without exception in Austria, he stressed, was equal before the law, all classes were to cooperate, there was to be no privileged party. The speech of Chancellor Schuschnigg made a great impression, both in Austria and abroad. It strengthened the will of the majority of the Austrian people to fight for the independence and integrity of their country.

Austrian Nazi Demonstrations.

The Austrian National Socialists were incensed at the speech. They were mostly active not in Vienna, where they probably represented only a small minority, but in the two provinces of Styria and Carinthia where they formed a majority of the middle-class population. Graz, the capital of Styria, became the headquarters of an open revolt against the Viennese regime. Graz had always been the most important seat of Pan-Germanic agitation in the Habsburg Monarchy. Under the influence of Seyss-Inquart, the Austrian Government did not take any decisive measures against the National Socialist youth in the provinces who were even allowed to use the Hitler salute and to wear the Swastika. On the other hand, the negotiations between the workers and the Government proceeded only very slowly. The workers were ready to defend the Government against any National Socialist revolt, but they demanded certain concessions on the part of the Government. These concessions would have legalized the Social Democratic activities in a way similar to those granted to the National Socialists, but the Government was reluctant to concede them.

Nation-wide Plebiscite Proclaimed.

Thus time was lost. The National Socialists within the Government made energetic action on the part of the police against Nazi demonstrations impossible; the pressure from Germany increased, and, at the beginning of March, Dr. Schuschnigg found himself in a difficult position. Under these circumstances Chancellor Schuschnigg proclaimed, in the Tyrol, his native province, a nation-wide plebiscite for Sunday, March 13, to decide whether Austria wished to remain an independent state. Every Austrian citizen above 24 years of age had the right to participate in the plebiscite. The age of 24 was fixed in accordance with the Austrian Constitution. The short time of four days between the announcement of the plebiscite and the plebiscite itself was to exclude protracted violent propaganda which might have led to many clashes.

Hitler's New Ultimatum.

The National Socialists reacted violently to the news of the plebiscite. On March 11, the German radio and press spread the news of Communist demonstrations and disorders in Austria. In the afternoon of the same day, a representative of the German Government arrived by airplane in Vienna and brought an ultimatum which demanded a postponement of the plebiscite, the resignation of the Cabinet of Schuschnigg and the formation of a new Cabinet under Seyss-Inquart. This ultimatum was turned down by the Austrian President, Miklas. Immediately afterwards the ultimatum was repeated with the threat, that, should it not be agreed to by evening, 200,000 German troops would march into Austria. On the same evening Chancellor Schuschnigg declared in a radio address that President Miklas and he had decided to give way before the threat of force. Schuschnigg resigned and his concluding words were 'God save Austria.'

Occupation of Austria; Hitler's Entry into Vienna.

A few hours later Austria had ceased to exist; German airplanes, tanks and troops had crossed the frontiers. The move had been well prepared. Within a few hours Austria was not only occupied by German troops, but all the functions of the Police and Administration were taken over by German officials of which each one seemed to have his exact duty well defined in advance. The Government constituted by Seyss-Inquart after the resignation of Schuschnigg is reported to have called the German troops to Austria. On March 13, the day which had been fixed for the plebiscite on Austria's independence, German troops and German officials were completely in control of Austria, and the country, where nobody but the Nazis dared to show themselves in the street, offered a totally coordinated picture. Chancellor Hitler had followed his troops, and triumphantly entered his native town at the border of Bavaria and Upper Austria, then Linz, the capital of Upper Austria, where he had gone to high school; and, on March 14, reached Vienna, the city where he had spent the years of his youth.

Plebiscite for the Anschluss.

On April 10, 1938, a plebiscite was held in the Nazified Austria which gave an overwhelming majority for the Anschluss. As the union of Austria with Germany was in any case an accomplished fact which the result of the plebiscite could in no way change, most people bowed before the fact and the success of an active policy. The immense propaganda machine of the German Reich filled all the air and all the printing presses of Austria, for several weeks, with its impressive and unceasingly-repeated assertions. The Austrian Government was dissolved, Austria became an integral part of the German Reich. All the marks of its traditional unity and civilization were erased. The German Reich not only became Great Germany, it acquired a large expansion of its army and its resources, it occupied the most important strategic position on the Danube from where, for many centuries, Central Europe had been dominated politically, economically, and culturally. The three great and very efficient Austrian armament factories now began to work for German rearmament. The possession of Austria completed the encirclement of Czechoslovakia rendering its situation most precarious.

Reaction of Foreign Powers.

The disappearance of Austria had been made possible by the fact that Great Britain had declined to warn Germany energetically, that she would support Austrian independence. France had been, during the critical days, in the midst of a difficult change of Government. Mussolini and especially the Italian people were taken by surprise by the sudden action of Germany, and there is no doubt that Italian public opinion looked suspiciously, for the most part, at the disappearance of the Austrian buffer state, which had for all practical purposes been an Italian protectorate, and at the new strong position which the German army occupied at the Brenner Pass. But Mussolini was too deeply committed to the Rome-Berlin Axis and too much convinced of the inertia and weakness of Great Britain and France to be able to protest against the annexation of Austria.

Nazification.

Chancellor Hitler entrusted the Nazification of Austria to Reichskommissar Burckel who had fulfilled a similar task in the Saar after the plebiscite in January 1935. His task was facilitated by the Austrian Catholic bishops who declared themselves ready to vote 'yes' in the forthcoming plebiscite and exhorted the Catholics to vote similarly. The Viennese Archbishop, Cardinal Innitzer, revealed that he had promises from Burckel which satisfied the Catholic Church in Austria. In a personal letter to which he appended 'Heil Hitler,' the Cardinal expressed his conviction of a just collaboration between the Catholic Church and the Nazi state. This attitude of the Austrian bishops was in contradiction to the attitude which the German Catholic bishops had taken. [Early in April Cardinal Innitzer was called to Rome to explain his stand.] The collaboration between the Nazi state and the Catholic Church in Austria did not last very long, and before the year was over, Cardinal Innitzer felt the heavy hand of the new regime. The Catholic Church found itself very soon in a position of complete retreat and had to suffer all the disadvantages which had been imposed in increasing measure upon the Catholic Church in Germany.

Suppression of Opposition.

The occupation of Austria, with its large and influential Jewish population in Vienna, led to a rapid intensification of the anti-Jewish measures of the Nazi Government. These measures hit the Jewish population of Austria infinitely harder than they had the German Jewish population, for in Germany in 1933 they were introduced gradually and had only progressively led to the complete exclusion of the Jews from the economic and social life of the country. In Austria, however, they were introduced, from the beginning, in the full severity which they had reached in Germany by 1938. Immediately after the occupation of Austria vehement and savage persecutions of the Jewish population started.

Not only Jews, but also Catholics and other opponents of the Nazi regime were imprisoned, tortured and driven to suicide; their property was confiscated, looted or appropriated, and law and order set aside. The lawlessness and ensuing corruption were so great that, on July 2, Burckel had to arrest twelve of the Nazi Kommissars in Vienna and send them to concentration camps. A growing part of the Austrian population was reported to be dissatisfied with the severity of the Nazi regime. Chancellor Schuschnigg was held a prisoner in the headquarters of the Gestapo, the secret State Police in Vienna, and was not allowed any outside communications. Several times it was reported that he would be brought before a court, but no definite step had been taken at the beginning of 1939. On the other hand, the murderers of Chancellor Dollfuss who had been executed in 1934 became martyrs and heroes although, at the time of their insurrection in July 1934, the German Reich had officially declared that it not only had had no part in the murder but abhorred it. Now, many of the important squares of Austria are named after the names of the murderers of Chancellor Dollfuss, and an official cult has been started to glorify their action. (See also FRANCE: Foreign Relations; GERMANY; ITALY: Central European Relations; RELIGION: Jews.)