Pages

Showing posts with label Architecture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Architecture. Show all posts

1942: Architecture

All building not directly connected with the prosecution of the war was banned in 1942. Even essential construction was held up by shortages of building material.

In an effort to conserve our limited supply of metal for armament, such necessities as electrical wiring and fixtures, pipes, flashing, structural steel, gutters, hardware, reinforcing rods and plumbing fixtures were made available to builders only on a strict system of priorities. During the year substitutes, commonly wood, had to be used. Finally even wood was placed on the shortage list and 'temporary' housing had to be built of solid masonry.

Government Building.

What building there was fell into four major categories: (1) construction by the Army and Navy; (2) factory construction, discouraged unless absolutely necessary; (3) office buildings for the greatly expanded group of government employees; and (4) housing for workers in war industries.

For obvious reasons, the work in the first two categories has almost invariably been secret. Some publicity was, however, given to the new buildings at the Great Lakes Naval Training Station in Illinois. Here Eltinge, Lamb & Schweikher designed some brick row-houses for officers and their families which show what skill and imagination can accomplish even within a limited budget. The houses are small, but open planning makes them seem rather spacious. Downstairs, only the kitchen-laundry is fully partitioned. Elsewhere, open wooden studs merely suggest divisions between rooms.

The reception center which has been built at this same naval station as a meeting place for enlisted men, their friends and families is outstanding. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill were the architects. The long, low building is entirely of wood and glass, and one feels that the wood was not just used as a substitute for metal, but that it was welcomed for its own special qualities. The roof of the main hall is supported by laminated wood arches, and a balcony along one side gives a pleasantly human scale. Walls are paneled in natural plywood. The entrance side of the ground floor is completely of glass, cleanly separated from the gay wooden canopy which shelters the entrance.

Examples of attractive, well-planned recreation centers on a smaller scale are the service men's canteens which the Pepsi-Cola Company has opened in New York and Washington, D. C.

The largest construction job of 1942 was the pentagonal four-story building erected in Arlington, Va., for the War Department. The 6,000,000 sq. ft. of floor space will provide twenty-five miles of offices for 40,000 government workers. The building is laid out about a great pentagonal court. Since most of the offices are artificially lighted and air-conditioned (each side of the pentagon measures about 200 feet from outer wall to court-facing wall), one wonders whether a more compact rectangular block would not have been a more economical building form. Provision is made for taxis and buses to drive right into the building and vertical communication is by means of ramps.

Housing Deficiency and Rectification.

It is impossible to estimate the loss of production which has been due to inadequate housing. Unable to find decent living quarters for himself and his family in one city, the worker moves on to the next. This quick labor turnover, fatal to efficient production, is found not only in the industrial cities, but in Washington, where there is a serious shortage of accommodations for office workers. This important problem was dramatized in an exhibition, War Housing, held at the Museum of Modern Art, New York, in the early spring, then circulated about the United States.

One important effect of the war has been encouragement to prefabrication. The government has been using prefabricated houses as quickly as the manufacturers could turn them out. The largest and most attractive group of prefabricated-panel houses remains the Carquinez Heights project at Vallejo, Calif. Some of the houses are of plywood, others are of composition-board over wood frame, and all are demountable.

But prefabrication is not the only answer. On one corner of the tract, the architect of the project, William Wilson Wurster, has built a small group of experimental houses of three different types, each one not only better looking but actually cheaper than the mass-produced prefabricated houses nearby.

Also at Carquinez Heights are prefabricated, demountable dormitories built by the Farm Security Administration for single workers. Room-width prefabricated panels are used in unusual two-story platform construction.

At Beaumont, Texas, David R. Williams has designed an original and successful group of demountable, rectangular, one-story buildings to house four families, one at each corner. Kitchens and bathrooms are concentrated at the center, lighted and ventilated beneath a monitor roof. The Federal Public Housing Authority was so pleased with the economy of this scheme that they have encouraged its imitation elsewhere.

The housing development at Center Line, Mich., is planned around a school-community center which is as handsome in appearance as it is progressive in plan. Classrooms and community offices are in separate one-story wings, dominated by an auditorium with an asymmetrical double-pitched roof. Each classroom has its own door to the outside. Most of the building is wood frame, finished with vertical boarding and contrasting vividly with occasional massive brick walls, unbroken by windows. Eero Saarinen was the architect.

Outstanding Buildings.

Among buildings not connected with the war but brought to completion in the early months of the year is the Motion Picture Country House in the San Fernando Valley, Calif. This group of buildings for retired members of the movie industry, designed by the offices of W. L. Pereira, is a beautiful example of open, articulated planning and revealed structure.

Another outstanding building is the Tabernacle Church of Christ, Columbus, Indiana, one of the few modern churches in the country and one of the few churches anywhere in the world that dares to be asymmetrical. The cleanly differentiated elements of church and Bible School are arranged about a large reflecting pool: the quiet composition is punctuated by the free-standing vertical of a bell tower. The church interior is particularly impressive. Floor-to-ceiling window slits face the pool on the west, and the chancel receives a dramatic benediction of sunlight from the cast through a great surface of glass block concealed by an unusual oak screen. The architects, Eliel & Eero Saarinen, with E. D. Pierre and George Wright have affirmed in this dignified, straightforward design the important place which the Church can take in the modern world.

1941: Architecture

The major part of the year's architectural production has in one way or another been related to national defense. And the real story has to do with the program of defense housing, a problem which decentralization and expansion of industry, together with extension of army camps and naval bases, have made much more acute now than in the last war.

Defense Housing.

What with administrative confusion, Congressional suspicion, and highly organized opposition from real-estate interests, all of which have impeded the defense housing program since its inception in October 1940, it is remarkable that the program has gotten under way as quickly as it has, and miraculous that it has already produced some projects which are not only economical and pleasant to live in, but even architecturally distinguished.

Congress has already appropriated about $300,000,000 for this purpose, and is now considering a bill authorizing another $300,000,000. This money is being spent through various agencies, each working in its own peculiar ways the PBA (Public Buildings Administration, specialise in post-office architecture, designs projects in Washington with its own staff of civil service architects), the USHA (United States Housing Authority, four years experience with low cost public housing, works through locally appointed housing authorities), and the Federal Works Agency's Division of Defense Housing (set up in April for direct construction through independent architects). A small amount of defense housing has also been done by the FSA (Farm Security Administration, famous for its beautiful rural housing projects, works through its regional offices) and the TVA (Tennessee Valley Authority).

The Army has farmed out its housing problem to the PBA, but the Navy is doing its own construction.

According to the Architectural Forum, the 'average total cost of the first 100,000 defense houses, including land, utilities, streets, equipment and community facilities is about $3,900 for units which average slightly more than 2 bedrooms each.' In general, low cost was achieved without sacrifice of livability. Houses are tiny, but often conveniently arranged, attractively designed and, above all, grouped in pleasant and safe communities. Instead of the wasteful and dangerous old-fashioned gridiron plan, most designers have used a super-block layout to avoid unnecessary traffic streets, to retain the natural amenities of the site, and to provide safe and convenient recreation space.

Most of the work has been done by the PBA, including the largest single project of 3,000 units in San Diego, Calif. Most attractive of their published projects was built for families of enlisted men at Hickam Field, Hawaii. Here is a nice relationship between one and two story units, both with low, widespreading hipped roofs. Upper stories are faced with dark wood, lower stories are of masonry. Excellent ventilation is provided by a multitude of well-proportioned horizontal-flap windows, set in tiers and protected by deep eaves.

But most PBA housing is dull and unimaginative, set up without sufficient consideration for local living requirements, or for the findings of other Government agencies with longer experience in the field. The best work is being turned out by private architects working through either the USHA or the Division of Defense Housing of the FWA. The latter agency is particularly commendable for its choice of the country's most progressive and distinguished architects.

One of the largest projects is a group of 1,692 demountable houses for defense workers at Vallejo. Calif. William Wilson Wurster was the architect. Some of these houses are of plywood: most of them are of Homasote, a composition board. All are assembled from prefabricated panels. The one-story houses are ranged in parallel rows for uniform enjoyment of the most favorable orientation. To avoid expensive grading the houses are supported by concrete piers and are stepped up and down the rolling hills. The resulting pattern of flat roofs at various levels successfully removes all monotony from the parallel site plan. Wide roof-overhangs shield the large windows from too much direct sunlight.

Another handsome defense community designed to take full advantage of modern building methods is 300-unit Avion Village at Grand Prairie, Texas, designed by Roscoe P. DeWitt with David R. Williams and Richard J. Neutra as consultants. The buildings are crisp in outline, neat in detail; flat roofs are extended as deep sheltering eaves over concentrated groups of horizontally sliding windows. Projected from the two-story apartment blocks and adjacent to the individual living rooms are finely proportioned two-story open porches, a feature long recognized as advantageous by local builders, but all too often omitted by contemporary designers. New in American low cost housing is the one-story 3-bedroom houses sliding partitions between living room and adjoining bedroom can be pushed back whenever additional space or ventilation becomes desirable.

At New Kensington, Pa., is a well-designed project by the firm of Gropius and Breuer. All of the buildings are flat roofed double- or row-houses. Glass is concentrated on the sunny sides, but protected from the high summer sun by projecting sun shades constructed of open wooden louvres. An extraordinarily steep site prevented uniform orientation of all buildings for best exposure. As in Wurster's Vallejo project, grading was minimized by setting the houses on piers wherever necessary; but here the house-blocks run uniformly parallel to the contours of the slopes.

The defense housing project by George Howe and Louis I. Kahn at Middletown, Pa., shows an unfortunate mixture of flat roofs with gable roofs pitched in different directions. Confusion is the final result of this ingenious attempt at variety. But they have also designed an uncommonly attractive modern community center, to be built of wood and local stone.

The floor plan of the minimum-cost single-family house of one story and two bedrooms tends to become standardized. The typical unit is square, or nearly square, for economy of exterior wall area. Cooking and dining space are in an alcove off the living room. Bathroom and kitchen are set back to back to reduce plumbing costs. One side of the house is given over to two cross-ventilated bedrooms. The entrance door leads directly into the living room and corridor space, always wasteful, is reduced to a minimum. Given our present living requirements and building conditions as well as the need for stringent economy, any improvement of this basic scheme becomes difficult; but much variation is possible in construction, room proportions, fenestration and details.

The small but handsome defense community of Windsor Locks, Conn., by Hugh Stubbins, Jr., shows that a first-rate designer can develop this base-plan into something better than just economical shelter. In these houses the kitchen is open to the dining space yet screened from the living room proper. The windows of living room and main bedroom are grouped in a row under a protective trellis. The exterior, with low pitched gable roof over walls of vertical siding, is simple and well proportioned.

For Alexandria, Va., Kastner and Hibben have designed some defense housing of varied experimental construction. The most attractive of these have walls of either bituminous earth block or cement-stabilized earth tamped into movable forms (new version of an ancient structural method). With proper respect for the nature of these materials, the architects have built them up into piers and slablike walls unbroken by inset windows. Openings are concentrated in light wooden framework.

Prefabricated houses are widely used in the defense program. If they are easily demountable as well as prefabricated they are particularly well suited for erection in localities where extra housing will not be needed after the war. In a PBA experiment at Indian Head, Md., 650 units of identical plan and elevation were put up by 10 different prefabricators. To determine the most efficient of these structural systems, one of each type was demounted, transported over rough roads, and re-erected on new foundations. The TVA has evolved an interesting demountable house. Completely assembled in the factory, it is trucked to the site in separate three-ton slices.

Near Baltimore, 600 prefabricated houses for employees of the Glenn Martin factory have been built from plans developed by the Pierce Foundation. Single panels of special insulation-board replace all other wall materials. These panels are hung on the Foundation's patented horizontal wooden frame.

The FSA continued to turn out fine rural housing. The metal shelters of their camps for migratory workers are now laid out in a system of parallel rows, less formal than the old hexagonal layout. No longer a great gabled block, the typical community center has become long, low and well articulated, topped by intersecting shed roofs.

Private Houses.

Stimulated by prosperity and the popular desire for investments safe from possible inflation, private building flourished in the first half of 1941, undeterred by rising prices. But announcement of Government priorities on various essential building materials soon put a stop to all activity not directly helpful to national defense.

During the limited period of private construction, California retained its lead in quality of domestic architecture. Dailey, Funk, Wurster, Ain, Clark, Neutra, McCarthy, Harris and Corbett are only a few of the architects who have been designing houses which are straightforward, yet sensitively adjusted to site and climate; fresh and imaginative, yet unselfconscious; thoroughly modern, yet part of California's long native tradition of fine and simple building. These houses are often of unpainted wood with flat, shed, or low gable roofs. They are built close to the ground and their rambling plans embrace beautiful gardens. Rows of glass doors and windows under projecting roofs seem to unite indoors and outdoors.

Even the conservative East is beginning to discard its tightly symmetrical Neo-Georgian boxes for houses more directly conceived in terms of today's living requirements. Among the most capable of the younger architects is Carl Koch, known particularly for a group of five wooden houses which he built on a steep hillside in Belmont, Mass. Two new houses, one at East Sandwich, Mass., the other at Fitchburg, Mass., show many of the qualities which characterized the earlier group: economical but spacious and carefully detailed planning, quiet outlines, imaginative but respectful use of natural materials, and, above all, a romantic welcoming of nature into the very body of the house. The garden of the Fitchburg house penetrates right into the entrance hall, interrupted only by a wall of glass.

Edward D. Stone has recently finished a large house at East River, Conn. Low-sweeping hipped roofs and characteristic massing reveal the strong influence of Frank Lloyd Wright's prairie houses, but, unlike the originals, seem over-complicated. The floor plans, however, are open and flexible in Mr. Stone's best style. Particularly interesting is the staggered row of ground-floor guest rooms, each with its private garden.

Another very large modern house was completed in the first part of the year by Gropius and Breuer in Pittsburgh. Many parts of this house are fresh and crisp in design but they fail to add up to an integrated whole. Perhaps the architects' long concern with post-war Germany's need for 'minimum dwellings' has made it difficult for them to do their best work on the very different problem of the luxury house. The Pittsburgh mansion is filled with expensive and timely gadgets but in essence it is still a greatly magnified 'minimum dwelling.'

In 1941, modern architecture made its début in eastern speculative building. Small groups of houses went up in Washington, in the Bronx, in Falmouth, Mass., and in Madison, Wis., none of great architectural merit, but all unusually livable for this type of housing and all successful from the point of view of the speculator.

Educational Buildings.

Three outstanding school buildings were completed this year, buildings which should make education a pleasure to the fortunate children who will use them: Acalanes Union High School, Contra Costa County, Calif., by Franklin and Kump, designers of other revolutionary California schools; School for Crippled Children, Denver, Colo., by Burnham Hoyt, architect of Denver's famous Children's Hospital; and Crow Island School, Winnetka, Ill., by Eliel and Eero Saarinen in association with Perkins. Wheeler & Will. All three schools are designed to make the child feel at ease, not to overawe him with massive walls and colonnaded fronts. All are built close to the ground and planned for utmost enjoyment of sunshine and the outdoors.

Acalanes has three parallel rows of class rooms joined by open-sided corridors. Each row is really a single open loft, divided by movable partitions into classrooms of the desired size. Since class-rooms receive light from two sides, ceilings can be low. Heat-resisting glass is used on the south sides of the buildings to obviate the necessity for shades.

The Denver school is built on the pavilion system: pairs of class rooms alternate with open garden courts where classes can be held in pleasant weather. Each class-room presents an all-glass front to its adjacent court. The beams and the round columns of the reinforced concrete frame are exposed as integral ornament. The beautifully proportioned exterior is faced with precast concrete slabs.

The first step in planning the Crow Island school was to design the ideal classroom unit. Each has two adjacent sides of glass; each has its own connecting workroom and private garden. Then these units, together with the other necessary facilities, were assembled in a pinwheel-like scheme with three decisively articulated wings for pre-school, primary and intermediate activities. The exterior of this handsome building is partly massive brick, partly vertical boarding over wood-frame.

At Wheaton College, Norton, Mass., is a new Student-Alumnae Building designed by Caleb Hornbostel and Richard M. Bennet, winners of the Museum of Modern Art's 1938 competition for an art center to have been built at the same college. As the final result of so much good will it is disappointing to find a rather forbidding brick structure enlivened by incongruously playful details.

A new building by Frank Lloyd Wright is always a major architectural event. He has now completed a $50,000 chapel at Lakeland, Fla., first unit of his general plan for the development of Florida Southern College. The chapel is dominated by a 63-foot poured concrete tower embellished by free-swinging bells and by flower boxes incorporated in the structure at three different levels. The main building is composed of concrete blocks, many of which are perforated and inlaid with colored glass. As in his California houses of the early twenties, the joints between the blocks are reinforced with small steel rods. Light enters the auditorium through the pierced blocks, through a skylight, and through the rows of glass doors which lead from the interior gallery to exterior balconies. Less successful is the intricate pattern of the concrete block choirloft screen. Inside and out, vines and flowers climb over steel trellises and hang from the airy balconies of this extraordinary building.

The most widely publicized of the 1941 crop of buildings was the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D. C. The architects were John Russell Pope, Eggers and Higgins. The tremendous Neo-classic building, more like an imperial tomb than an art gallery for living Americans, was roundly censured by the country's leading architectural critics, applauded by those people who are deeply impressed by endless marble corridors and towering Corinthian columns. Popularly known as 'the last of the Papal Bulls,' the building has an inhuman scale which dwarfs even the superb collection it was built to house. What such a museum could be if honestly and reasonably designed is clear to anyone who remembers the Saarinens' winning project in the 1939 competition for a new building for Washington's Smithsonian Gallery of Art.

Also in Washington, however, is a large and frankly modern new office building by William Lescaze. The two exposed walls are cantilevered out beyond the concrete columns and striped with horizontally continuous bands of glass. On the west side concrete balconies are cantilevered out to shelter the glass from the afternoon sun.

Citizens of Buffalo, N. Y., are justly proud of their new Kleinhans Music Hall, designed by F. J. and W. A. Kidd in association with Eliel Saarinca. Although the building must serve many people and must provide for a great variety of activities, the architects succeeded in producing a simple, clearly articulated plan: two horseshoe-shaped auditoriums joined at their open ends by a common lobby. The massive exterior is perhaps even over-simplified in its faithful expression of internal volumes.

A number of large municipal buildings have gone up recently in New York. The new Tombs Prison and the Criminal Courts Building, by Harvey W. Corbett and Charles B. Meyers, are free of academy detail but, like Rockefeller Center, retain a heay monumentality foreign to the best contemporary design. Better modern architecture is found in Hunter College, completed last year, and in some of the Department of Sanitation structures.

The center of hotel building continues to be Miami Beach, Fla., where 41 hotels (and 166 apartment buildings) were rushed to completion for the 1940-41 season. The hotels are of about twelve stories, spread at pleasantly wide intervals along the beach. The typical hotel is modern in design, boasting large windows, many balconies and, for some unknown reason, a conspicuous tower.

Utilitarian Structures.

Characteristic of many of the factories going up all over the country is the Government tank arsenal in Detroit, designed by Albert Kahn for the Chrysler Corporation. Walls are of continuous steel sash and the steel frame support a monitor roof. Like a fine piece of machinery, the building has an unselfconscious beauty derived from complete fitness for its purpose. But the advantage of the all-glass factory are being questioned by they who prefer windowless buildings for the regularity of their artificial light and the consequent freedom of interior planning, the ease with which they can be air-conditioned and, most important, their suitability for black-out.

An extraordinarily good-looking variation on the new factory type is the Johnson & Johnson Ligature Building. The architects were R. G. and W. M. Cory, designers of the famous Starrett-Lehigh Building in New York. The Ligature Building is far and away the best of the group of new Johnson & Johnson structures scattered over a large tract of pleasantly wooded ground on either side of U.S. No. 1 near New Brunswick, N. J. Designed to attract the favorable attention of passing motorists as well as to provide space for the packaging of surgical ligatures, the low building is set diagonally to the highway. Each of the two exposed walls is faced with flat slabs of dazzling white Vermont marble and is broken only by a continuous narrow strip of plate glass which lights the offices behind. The actual working area is almost entirely artificially lighted. At the intersection of the two glass ribbons and projected beyond the smooth walls is the great corner-window which marks the reception hall.

The TVA has now completed Hiwassee Dam on the Tennessee River. A massive storage dam, it is similar in function and design to the famous earlier structure at Norris. Details are possibly more refined at Hiwassee, but the power-house is less decisive in outline than at Norris, where the simple rectangular block makes a spectacular contrast with the fluid forms of the dam.

Exhibitions.

'The Architecture of the TVA' was the subject of a spring exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art, New York. Other architecture exhibitions assembled and shown this year by that museum and later circulated about the country included 'The Work of Erich Mendelsohn' (the activity of a pioneer of modern architecture in Germany, England and Palestine), 'The Wooden House in America,' and 'Stockholm Builds' (photographs of modern Swedish architecture by G. E. Kidder Smith).

That group of young California architects and planners known as Telesis staged two vivid exhibitions this year, both of which received wide publicity. The first dealt with planning problems of the San Francisco Bay region: the second had to do with more general aspects of city-planning.

Bartlett Hayes, director of the Addison Gallery in Massachusetts, developed in interesting new technique for his traveling exhibition of 'What Is a Building?' The basic elements of structure and design are explained by 3-dimensional movable models mounted on easily-packed plywood panels. By manipulating the models the spectator gets first-hand experience with each problem and learns much more than he could from a mere array of photographs, plans and text.

Other Countries.

It is impossible to get information on the military building of Europe and non-military building seems almost non-existent. Many of Europe's leading architects and city-planners have sought refuge in this country, where they are teaching or engaged in private practice. Some private building does continue, however, in Switzerland, including a large modern church in Zürich and a large and handsome new class-building for the University of Basel.

Partly through the misfortunes of other countries, but mostly through our own vigorous expansion of independent creative effort, the United States has in the past few years assumed a dominant position in the field of building. Latin America, too, is extraordinarily active and has abandoned her preoccupation with Beaux-Arts precedent for more modern design. Much of the work still seems derivative and second-rate, but there are indications in many of these countries that the achievement of a more substantial, less provincial architecture, at once native and modern, may not be far distant. See also CIVIL ENGINEERING; HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS.

1940: Architecture

In any serious survey of architecture in 1940, the United States must assume a position of unprecedented importance. Not since the heyday of Chicago office-building construction in the '80s and the 'prairie houses' of Frank Lloyd Wright in the early years of the century has this country produced architecture of such quality and vitality.

Contributing to this renascence is the war which, negatively, has cut down construction abroad, and positively, has brought to this country many of Europe's most capable designers.

A New Independence.

What is more important, war psychology has stimulated an already existing tendency toward architectural independence — independence not only of the Beaux-Arts and of traditional European styles, but also of the international clichés of modern architecture. While the movement toward self-sufficient nationalism may be socially questionable and economically injurious, in architecture it encourages self-analysis and a new and healthy awareness of native problems and potentialities.

Architects are seeing with fresh and sympathetic eyes our unselfconscious vernacular buildings: the monumental stone and wood barns of Pennsylvania, the neat New England farmhouses, the ascetic buildings of the Shakers, the low, rambling Western ranch-houses, the old redwood-shingled houses of the San Francisco Bay region, even the dilapidated wooden buildings of Western mining-towns. They admire the economical, direct construction and the straightforward, often imaginative use of native materials, and find themselves incorporating some of this same fine regional flavor into their own work; no longer do they limit themselves to the characterless 'machine-smooth' materials and box-like forms which were so fashionable ten years ago.

New Attitude Toward Materials.

There is a new interest in natural materials such as stone, brick, and above all, wood. Sometimes these materials are used in the traditional way, if that is the way in which they still serve best; more often they are used in new ways, better suited to new production methods and living conditions. But inevitably, in the best work, each material is treated to emphasize those characteristics which differentiate it from all other materials, and the structure and form of the building is developed as directly as possible from the nature of the materials used. Important in this new phase of design is the segregation of building materials according to their best, most natural function; masonry, for instance, is best suited to unbroken wall-surfaces.

A spectacular example of segregation of materials is the famous house at Bear Run, Pennsylvania, which Frank Lloyd Wright designed in 1938 for E. J. Kaufmann. Here the core of the house is of local stone laid up in vertical masses broken only by the narrowest of window-slits. Projected out from this heavy core are great cantilevered terraces of reinforced concrete, partly enclosed by glass to form living space on various levels. The alert sensitivity to the nature of materials which finds expression in this audacious, yet thoroughly suitable use of stone and concrete has always been characteristic of Mr. Wright's work; like many of his principles, it is only now finding a sympathetic counterpart in the work of younger architects.

Whereas five or ten years ago unpainted wood was considered 'restless,' because its texture detracted from the desired effect of flat planes, now paint is avoided and materials are chosen with special regard for their surface interest. Natural materials such as cork, matting and bamboo are in great favor, and wood of all varieties and finishes: sometimes in its original state, complete with bark; sometimes in cross-section, especially for floor-blocks; sometimes as smoothly finished, neatly joined horizontal or vertical boarding; sometimes as great sheets of plywood, waxed or oiled to bring out the pattern of the veneer.

Even synthetic materials are influenced by the interest in surface texture; witness the sudden popularity of such products as ribbed glass, corrugated cement board, corrugated iron, and expanded metal mesh.

The new interest in materials was pushed into Wagnerian romanticism by the industrial designer, Russel Wright, in his exhibits at the summer show of Industrial Art at New York's Metropolitan Museum, and at the exhibition of interior design, 'America at Home,' at the New York World's Fair. His new hickory-splint furniture was shown in cave-like settings of giant boulders, mammoth stone fireplaces, fur rugs, animal heads, and jungle-like masses of greenery.

George Howe's exhibit at 'America at Home,' designed in collaboration with the sculptor, Wharton Esherick, used wood in various pseudo-primitive forms. The folk-art influence perceptible here appears again and again in contemporary interiors. Authentic primitive objects are frequently used; old Indian blankets, Moroccan and Indian rugs, African stools, etc. The suitability of primitive art to the modern interior was exploited years ago in Europe but is only now being discovered here in the United States.

New Forms.

Along with this new attitude toward materials is a new attitude toward form. The roof of a modern house is no longer inevitably flat. The hipped roof and even the long-despised shed (one-way pitch) and gable roofs are enthusiastically restored to favor. But whether the roof is flat or pitched, it is emphatically horizontal in effect, and is often continued out beyond the house walls as wide-spread sheltering eaves or trellises. Characteristic modern roof-lines are the sweeping hipped roofs of Harwell Hamilton Harris' Los Angeles houses, the decisive shed roofs of some of William Wilson Wurster's houses around San Francisco, the asymmetrical double-pitched roof as used by Rudolf Mock in Princeton, New Jersey, and the flat roof with projecting overhangs and trellises as John Funk has used it in houses in Modesto and Berkeley, California.

Just as the that plane of the roof tends to break up into angles, just as wall surfaces take on new interest through texture, so floor-plans become increasingly more fluid as the right angle often dissolves into diagonals and free curves. As rectangular planning breaks up, the character of the enclosed space becomes less decisive, and in a way more human. Something of the same effect is achieved by the sudden popularity of grillwork, which is a suggestion of space enclosure rather than an irrevocable definition.

Foreign Influences.

Various foreign influences, together with the new interest in the American scene and in the work of Frank Lloyd Wright, have contributed to this new movement in architecture.

Eleven years ago Miës van der Rohe featured a screen-wall of onyx and a curving wall of macassar ebony in his Tugendhat house at Brno, Czechoslovakia. And LeCorbusier, the famous Swiss-French architect, pioneered in the use of diagonals, free curves and natural materials; the single, oddly-curved rubble wall of his Swiss Dormitory at the Cit‚ Universitaire in Paris (1932) contrasts brilliantly with the slick-surfaced regular forms of the rest of the building.

Of special pertinency has been the work of the Finnish architects, Alvar and Aino Aalto, first presented in this country by the Museum of Modern Art in 1938. Their Finnish Pavilion at the New York World's Fair was a fine three-dimensional example of their fluid planning and their extraordinarily imaginative, yet thoroughly craftsmanlike use of wood.

Frank Lloyd Wright.

The most important and influential figure in American architecture is still Frank Lloyd Wright. His great and basic innovations in plan and space-use were made years ago; the importance of his recent work lies rather in his masterful use of materials, new and old, in new types of construction and new and suitable forms. Each material challenges him to find for it a new and appropriate plastic expression.

Two of his projects which have attracted considerable attention from the press are the Community Church for Kansas City and the ambitious Crystal Heights project for Washington, D. C. Both are now ready for construction.

The horizontal masses of the Community Church are emphasized by cantilevered balconies and parking-terraces. Searchlights set in the copper roof play skywards to replace the conventional bell-tower. The building is supported by internal columns. Walls are merely a 2½' protective envelope of steel and 'gunnite': concrete sprayed from both sides onto a lattice of steel posts woven with bands of steel and paper.

Crystal Heights, designed for a large, sloping, wedge-shaped corner lot in the heart of Washington, will contain a hotel, apartments, movie-theater, shops and parking facilities. On the long sides of the wedge, facing Connecticut and Florida Avenues, are five floors of shops, reached by cantilevered open-air promenades. Behind the shops, within the angle which they form, is parking space on various levels.

On higher land at the wide end of the wedge, set among fine old trees, will be a group of 14 apartment-towers (one with 20 floors, the others with 12). Their design is based on Mr. Wright's 1929 St. Mark's Tower project; floors are cantilevered out from internal supporting piers of reinforced concrete, and the apartments are planned on a system of 60° and 30° angles.

Over the last three years Mr. Wright and his apprentice-draughtsmen have built for themselves an Arizona winter home and workshop, Taliesin West. Rocks found scattered about the desert site were piled up in rough forms and concrete poured over to make waist-high walls of varied side-slopes. On these walls rest great wooden roof trusses, pitched at an angle which recalls the outlines of the surrounding mountains. There is no glass: the roofs and the upper parts of the walls are composed of canvas-covered shutters, easily flapped open for view and ventilation. Closed, they admit pleasantly diffused light. Few buildings can equal this spectacular desert camp in intimate adjustment of construction and form to specific problems of site, climate, and labor conditions.

Along with the larger commissions, Mr. Wright is doing a host of small-to-medium houses all over the country. Many of the smaller houses are similar in construction to the well-known Jacobs house (1937) in Madison, Wisconsin. There is no basement; the one-story house stands on a thin concrete floor mat under which are copper heating coils embedded in broken stone. This ingenious method of heating is claimed to be very successful. On the floor mat are set prefabricated 2½' thick wall units built up of three layers of wood separated by insulating paper. The core is heavy plywood; inner and outer surfaces alike are of horizontal boards, unpainted. In plan these houses are often L-shaped, with the sleeping wing linked to a large projecting living room by compact service and dining space. A successful variation is the Bazett House, Hillsborough, California, where the board walls are disposed on a 'honeycomb plan' to effect an amazingly spacious interior.

More dramatic in appearance are the hillside houses which are launched into space by cantilevers; these are usually of stone or brick with wooden superstructure and airy terraces stiffened with steel for maximum projection. The living room of the Affleck House, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, is a partially enclosed balcony, projected out from a series of slim masonry piers. The newly finished Lloyd Lewis House in Libertyville, Illinois, is another magnificent example of this type of design. The Sturges House in Los Angeles rests on a single heavy core of masonry; it juts out so boldly that it seems to leave its hillside site untouched.

Houses.

It is always interesting to see what architects build for their own use. The house which Marcel Breuer has built for himself in Lincoln, Massachusetts, is thoroughly contemporary both in plan and in use of materials. The two long walls, one wood, one glass, of the living room taper together to butt against the convex stone wall which closes one end of the room. At the opposite end, the dining room and one of the balcony-bedrooms open to the living room to effect an agreeable extension of its apparent space.

Oscar Stonorov's house for himself near Phoenixville, Pennsylvania, also shows curves, diagonals, imaginative three-dimensional space-planning, and contrasting, textured materials. Particularly successful is the two-story living room with its oblique wood-faced balcony, its graceful cantilevered staircase, and its finely proportioned floor-to-ceiling glass wall.

A one-story house in Ojai, California, by Emrich Nicholson and Douglas Maler, has an arc-shaped bedroom block separated from the main living block by an open terrace. Some of the living room walls are freely curved, others diagonal.

Few architects are producing more ingratiating domestic work than Harwell Hamilton Harris. Strongly influenced by Frank Lloyd Wright, Harris is yet an imaginative and powerful architect in his own right. In addition to new houses in Los Angeles, and a highly original Chinese restaurant, he has this year built a daringly cantilevered house on a Berkeley hillside.

Other California architects who are turning out excellent modern work are John Dinwiddie, John Funk, Gregory Ain, Hervey Parke Clark, Gardner Dailey, and William Wilson Wurster. Wurster's houses are unique in their unstyled functionalism, an approach which always gives a self-respecting, thoroughly livable building, and sometimes results in a forthright, effortless distinction.

In addition to his large practice in Los Angeles and, more recently, in San Francisco, Richard Neutra has completed this year a large house in Portland, Oregon.

At Belmont, Massachusetts, Carl Koch has built an interesting group of small houses, notable for imaginative, yet precise handling of stone and wood, and for decisive, freshly studied roof lines.

Edward D. Stone designed a model house for exhibition on one of the terraces of Rockefeller Center, New York. This amusing skyscraper excrescence, built of unpainted redwood with a shed roof, had a remarkably flexible and ingenious plan. The same architect built this year a very successful house in Old Westbury, Long Island. This house provides a fine, easy relationship between interior and exterior, and makes a splendid non-competitive background for the owner's collection of paintings and antique furniture.

In New York, Sanders, Breck and Smith-Miller have remodeled a brownstone-front into apartments and offices for their own use, and have produced one of the best-looking buildings in the city.

Little has come out of those flurries of interest in prefabrication which enlivened the '30s; the few types of prefabricated houses which are actually on the market are thoroughly undistinguished in design. Not yet on the market, but indicative of the multitude of structural and formal possibilities in this field, are William Callaway's experimental metal-framed octagonal house-units in Los Angeles and the John B. Pierce Foundation's Experimental House No. 2, built this year in Lebanon, New Jersey. This house is supported by widely spaced 4'x4' wooden posts; attached to the posts above and below bands of horizontally sliding windows are prefabricated plywood girders.

Private Apartments and Public Housing.

The United States has been slow to take advantage of new available techniques of apartment house design. The public low-cost housing projects, with their relatively low ground coverage and resulting amplitude of light, air and play-space, are far in advance of private enterprise. One of the two or three eastern apartment buildings with serious pretensions to rationalized, really contemporary planning was completed this year on Central Park South, New York, by Mayer & Whittlesey. Apartments are grouped in two separate towers, joined below by shops and gardens. This gives each apartment a maximum of view and cross-ventilation.

Two distinguished new low-rent projects built under the United States Housing Authority are Branch Village in Camden, New Jersey, and Mount Pleasant in New Britain, Connecticut. The Camden project, by Hettel, Radey & Stonorov, is built around a handsome community center. At the center of each alternate row of houses is a service unit containing heating equipment, laundry, and drying yard.

Ludorf, Bishop & Stonorov have completely eliminated noisy, dangerous through-streets in their design for Mount Pleasant; instead there are dead-end streets and pleasant foot-paths. Here the wood-framed sleeping floors of the row-houses project out over the brick walls beneath to provide shade for living room windows and sheltered outdoor sitting space as well as desirable extra bedroom space.

The housing which the Farm Security Administration is building for western agricultural workers is readily comparable in quality of design with the best low-cost housing of Europe and Scandinavia. Sometimes the houses of these cooperative farms are single-family, each surrounded by its own subsistence garden. The trim wooden houses at Mineral King Ranch, near Visalia, California, and the shed-roofed adobe houses of Casa Grande, Arizona, are of this first type.

More often the houses are joined in rows of eight. In the characteristic lay-out, the flat-roofed house-rows run east-west. Their long south sides are sheltered from too much direct sunlight by overhanging eaves and by the projection of the upper floor beyond the lower. The sleeping floor has no glass: instead there are two rows of shutters, the upper of Celloglas (wired cellophane), the lower of plywood, which admit plenty of light and which can be flapped open for efficient cross-ventilation. The rows of houses are grouped informally about a community social center and laundry; farm buildings are nearby.

Handsome communities of this type have been built at Eleven Mile Corner, Arizona, at Yuba City in northern California, and in other agricultural areas from Walla Walla to the Imperial Valley. While these cooperatives for permanent settlers usually adjoin FSA camps for migratory farm workers, the two must not be confused.

Shops and Factories.

By using a splayed glass front for a dress shop on narrow frontage in Berkeley, California, John Dinwiddie has not only enlarged its apparent width, but has made a thoroughly inviting entrance. A freely curving garden plot continues from the sidewalk into the shop itself, interrupted only by the plate glass front.

Another exceptionally attractive shop was designed for Altman & Kuhne on Fifth Avenue New York, by Gruenbaum & Krummeck. Here the regular pattern formed on ceiling and one side-wall by a network of bronze light-troughs is used as a foil for a curving staircase and a scalloped floor-pattern.

The new Sears Roebuck in Los Angeles, designed by Redden & Raben expressly for an automobilist-clientele, is a low-lying, windowless building of considerable originality.

The major share of new industrial work continues to go to Albert Kahn, Inc., of Detroit. Kahn-designed factories, typified by the new Toledo Scale Company in Ohio, are true industrial monuments, with virile power in their frank skeleton construction, their great sweeps of glass, their lean, clean lines. In comparison, the accompanying administration buildings, with their heavy, window-pierced, symmetrical facades, seem fussy and earth-bound.

Other Buildings.

The few good schools of 1940 include, in California, buildings by Franklin & Kump and the Oakdale Union School by Mayo & Johnson, and in Michigan, the brick gymnasium-auditorium designed by Lyndon & Smith for the Farmington High School.

The massive limestone and brick Fire Alarm Building in Houston, Texas, designed by MacKie & Kamrath, achieves a contemporary and legitimate kind of monumentality through concentration of glass areas and treatment of the limestone as great wall-planes unbroken by windows.

William Lescaze has designed a great balconied office-building which is now under construction in Washington, D. C.

The most handsome large building of the year is probably the Lake County Sanatorium at Waukegan, Illinois. Designed by William A. Ganster and the office of W. L. Pereira, it is the first hospital in this country which may be compared in quality and contemporaneity of design with the best work of the kind in Europe. The long, two-storied main building faces the south with an all-glass, balconied front; the bedrooms behind are flooded with sunlight and each bed can easily be pushed out onto an adjacent terrace. The nearby nurses' home was designed with the same care for orientation, plan workability, and plastic expression.

Exhibitions.

The summer exhibitions of 'America at Home' and 'Contemporary American Industrial Art' have already been mentioned. Most people agree that the most attractive interior in either show was the living room by Harwell Hamilton Harris, his first work in the East.

A major exhibition of 'Space for Living' was carefully prepared by Telesis (group of young West Coast designers) and presented with fine showmanship at the San Francisco Museum of Art. Using the San Francisco Bay Region as an example, the exhibition challenged the public to analyze its environment in the light of modern needs and possibilities.

The work of Frank Lloyd Wright, from the 1893 Winslow House through projects now on the drawing-boards, was illustrated in a large one-man show held at the Museum of Modern Art in New York during the last two months of the year. Twenty-one impressive architectural models were on exhibition with plans, photographs, and beautiful original drawings.

Another important Museum activity was the publication of a Guide to Modern Architecture — Northeast States, which lists the addresses, architects, and construction dates of about 300 buildings, together with short critical notes and instructions for automobilists.

Architecture Abroad.

Scant information is available on European architecture of 1940, even on the relatively small amount of non-military building.

Finland has wisely allotted to Aalto the enormous problem of reconstruction and shelter provision for refugees from the Karelian Isthmus. Wishing to avoid the waste of temporary barracks, Aalto has developed a plan whereby soundly built permanent housing will be constructed in new, carefully planned communities. But at first the houses will be mere shells; modern conveniences will be added as time and money allow.

The death in 1940 of Robert Maillart ended the productive career of Switzerland's famous engineer, one of the greatest of our time. His slim, attenuated, concrete bridges, stripped of every surplus pound, have an audacious elegance which goes far beyond mere engineering. Less well-known than his bridges is his development of a concrete mushroom-slab construction in which the column tapers into the ceiling slab in one graceful, unbroken curve; the usual intermediate slab is avoided.

Among the most promising of the younger architects is Hans Fischli, whose wooden houses show an acute sensibility to materials and proportions which is too often lacking in the work of the older Swiss modernists.

The new Trade School at Berne, Switzerland, by Hans Brechbühler, is unthinkable without the precedent of LeCorbusier's Swiss Dormitory. The four-storied main block, its finely articulated concrete skeleton filled in with glass, is cantilevered out over round concrete columns which lift it clear of the ground.

Italy went ahead with its summer Triennale in Milan as planned. This exhibition of applied art was presented with the flawless technique which has made Italian exhibitions famous all over the world.

As part of the extensive Fascist program of child welfare, L. G. Daneri has designed the mountain vacation home 'R. Piaggio.' The long, arc-shaped shed-roofed building presents a glass front to sun and view. Two floors of dormitories are lifted from the ground on concrete columns; part of the space beneath is enclosed as common rooms.

One of the fine Gothic palaces on the Grand Canal in Venice, the Palazzo Foscari, has been made over into a modern academy. The architect, Carlo Scarpa, tackled the difficult problem with sensitive intelligence; instead of trying to work within the original style, he has successfully injected frankly modern elements in happy and sympathetic contrast to the ancient shell.

Modern architecture in England is fortunate in having the support, not only of the intelligentsia, but also of such enlightened public bodies as the London Passenger Transport Board, the Zoo, and various school boards.

Outstanding among recent English work is the girls' high school designed by Denis Clarke Hall for Richmond, Yorkshire. One-story classrooms are grouped in pairs as separate pavilions connected by glazed corridors. These pavilions all face southeast and are well separated from the 'noisy areas' — gymnasium, laboratories, etc. The rubble walls, uninterrupted by windows, and the concentrated, concrete-framed glass areas form a splendid example of segregation of materials.

In London, E. Maxwell Fry has built a Hostel for Girls, straightforward but pedestrian in design. Its exposed concrete frame is filled in with colored brick and tile, a type of surface much more sensible in that grimy city than the stucco finish so popular a few years ago.

The war, however, has brought with it so many restrictions on building materials and public works that non-military building has been drastically curtailed.

Sir John Burnet, Tait & Lorne, have designed standardized, prefabricated units for evacuation camps. The construction is carefully and economically worked out, but the result is a grim succession of dreary barracks.

The beginnings of an authentic regional variation are found in Palestine. On Mount Scopus in Jerusalem, Erich Mendelsohn has designed a Medical Center as the first part of a large new Hebrew University. The buildings are of reinforced concrete, surfaced with machine-cut stone slabs. Since extremes of temperature make extensive use of glass inadvisable, the glass is concentrated in areas easily accessible to patients in need of sunshine. The buildings are partially protected from bitter winds by their disposition about sheltered courts. A thoroughly native element is the use of shallow concrete domes which recall Arabian saucer-domes. The unforced, carefully studied, yet imaginative design marks a distinct advance in quality over Mendelsohn's earlier work in Germany.

1939: Architecture

Exposition Architecture.

With two World's Fairs going on at the same time in the United States, exposition buildings were the spot architectural news of 1939. Never before has so much money been poured into such temporary magnificence.

Few Fairs have had so beautiful a site as the Golden Gate Exposition's island in San Francisco Bay. But instead of exploiting this natural setting with sheltered terraces and great glass surfaces, most of the buildings presented blank walls to the view of bay, city and mountains, a procedure justifiable only on the windy side of the island. One of the few buildings to take full advantage of a waterfront site was W. W. Wurster's attractive Yerba Buena Club.

Gardner Dailey designed a fine pavilion for Brazil, and Ernest Born's San Joaquin Valley Building with its elliptical glass front was very attractive. The Hall of Floriculture, one of the few frankly temporary buildings of the Exposition, was completely enclosed by a new glass-like synthetic material stretched over a light wood frame hung from external wood trusses.

Behind the pleasantly simple natural plywood exterior of the United States Government Building (according to many visitors, the best building of the Exposition) were exhibitions of special interest as regards both content and presentation. For the first time in the history of government participation in fairs, the Federal exhibits were integrated to tell a vivid, thoroughly intelligible story of all the branches of government activity. The exhibition of Indian Affairs, designed by Rene d'Harnoncourt and Henry Klumb, was the most exciting single exhibition of the entire exposition.

But these buildings were exceptional in their timeliness and aesthetic integrity. In general, an all too conscious effort was made to capture the spirit of the traditional architectural styles of the Pacific Basin. Instead of seriously using regional materials and building techniques, the Architectural Commission chose to produce romantic, superficially exotic fantasies with all the textural and structural interest of papier-mache.

The stream-lined slip-cover style of the Fair-built buildings at the New York World's Fair is hardly more plausible as modern architecture than its more frankly fantastic California counterpart, and, because of its modern pretensions, is infinitely more dangerous as architectural precedent. (In justice to their designers, mention must be made of the extraordinary stipulations of the Board of Design; that all Fair-built buildings be artificially lighted, and that they be surfaced with painted plaster-board.) These buildings have a lack of human scale, of inherent order, of surface interest, which is hardly compensated for by their violent color. Their essential dullness is not mitigated by the uninspired site-plan of the Fair.

But not all the Fair-built buildings were of such questionable merit. There were some simple yet imaginative foot-bridges and information booths. And the Trylon and Perisphere, by Harrison & Fouilhoux, although a rather provincial out-growth of the cult of 'pure form' of the twenties, formed an adequate center-piece for the lavish architectural display.

Other good Harrison & Fouilhoux buildings were the Electrified Farm with its simple roof-lines and excellent use of glass and the Electric Utilities Building with its pleasant lounge and glass tunnel leading out through a giant spillway.

The Consolidated Edison Building also relied on water for its architectural interest. In front of the long unbroken curve of its blue facade was a 'Water Ballet,' a fountain display by the modern sculptor, Alexander Calder.

The success of the Children's World, perhaps the most distinguished American-designed work, can be traced to the fact that it was all in the same architectural hands: George Howe of Philadelphia, with Stonorov, Spigel & Bogert as associates. Other interesting buildings were the Distillers' Building by Morris Sanders, the Aviation Building by William Lescaze, and the triangular Petroleum Industries Building by Voorhees, Walker, Foley & Smith, who also designed the gay outdoor exhibit for the Budd Company. Another exhibition which can really be considered as architecture was the Pennsylvania exhibition, arranged by Gropius & Breuer, Bayer & Schawinsky in startling contrast to the replica of Independence Hail which housed it.

The foreign pavilions presented a much more lively scene than the American. Many people think that Sven Markelius' delightful Swedish Building was the best-designed building of the Fair. Certainly no one who had seen it would soon forget its inviting entrance, its fine flow of space from interior to exterior, its very human scale, or its unusual, yet thoroughly craftsmanlike use of natural wood. The straightforward simplicity of this building is characteristic of the best contemporary Swedish work and has little to do with the 'Swedish modern' superficialities now so fashionable in this country.

Another fresh and attractive building was the Finnish Pavilion, designed by the famous Finnish architects and furniture-designers, Alvar and Aino Aalto. Although the architects were limited to 'interior architecture' as the pavilion occupied space in the Fair-built Court of Nations, their design was a self-sufficient example of the most advanced trends in modern architecture. By using curving diagonal screens and balconies they were able to transform a narrow rectangular room into a dynamic play of volumes in three emphatic dimensions. The various planes were dramatized by the rich textures of wood used in new and ingenious ways. There were surfaces covered with half-round vertical battens, others with plywood sheets; and one wall was paved with tree-sections laid like random masonry. Every detail was freshly studied and the designers' joy in the material was directly communicated to the observer.

The third outstanding foreign building was that of Brazil, designed by Oscar N. Soares and Lucio Costa, former pupils of the great French modernist LeCorbusier. With its freely curving plan within the regular rhythm of the supporting columns and its fine use of luxurious materials, it was certainly the most architecturally elegant of all the pavilions.

Lescaze & Weber designed a charming pavilion for Switzerland, and the shamrock-shaped Irish Pavilion by Michael Scott was very attractive. The lacy metal tower of the Polish Pavilion deserves mention for the originality of its design and the excellence of its execution.

Iofan and Alabian wanted their building for the U.S.S.R. to be, above all, impressive. And in spite of its somewhat heavy style it succeeded in being one of the most monumental buildings of the Fair.

The Shelter Section was originally to have been an object lesson in good community planning and modern architecture; instead, it was a hodge-podge of unrelated houses. A. Lawrence Kocher's Plywood House and the House of Glass, by Landefeld and Hatch, were among the most interesting.

'Traditional' and 'Modern.'

Whereas ten, or even five, years ago all buildings could be classified as either Traditional or Modern, in 1939 this line of demarcation is no longer so absolute. The best 'traditional' work tends to borrow from 'modern' architecture its concern with economical site-use, advantageous orientation for sun, wind and view, simple roof-lines, extensive use of glass, and sometimes even the open, flexible plan. The standards set by the Federal Housing Administration have helped to raise the general level of small-house design.

On the other hand, modern architecture itself no longer has the white, impersonal boxiness which characterized the less inspired modern work of the twenties; there is a new feeling apparent in the best contemporary work all over the world. 'Functionalism' is becoming the basis for design rather than an end in itself.

A new regionalism is developing within what was once, with justice, called the 'International Style.' Architects are turning to folk-architecture for lessons in straightforward use of native materials, in adaptation of building form to climate. Although they continue to experiment with new and appropriate uses for the new materials and building-techniques made possible by the machine, architects have rediscovered natural materials, with their advantages of pleasant texture, economy, durability, and, in the case of wood, suitability to light, scientific construction.

As in the other fine arts, there is a tendency to abandon an all too rigid adherence to the right angle and the flat plane in favor of a more flexible, essentially more human kind of design in which both the diagonal and the free, biomorphic curve may find their place. Euclid was right, to be sure, but the changing pattern of life and the actual physical movements of man often demand more fluid forms.

Private Houses.

Since the private house is often relatively inexpensive, it frequently serves as a kind of experimental laboratory, not only for new products and building techniques, but also for new design trends. In the United States, for example, many of the most advanced new buildings are smallish private houses. The prevalence of these new tendencies in architecture becomes apparent when one glances at the results, as published in the architectural magazines, of the year's many competitions for the design of small houses.

The best of this new work is peculiarly American and regional in the most valid sense of the word. Of particular pertinence in this respect is the work of a new group of architects, John Yeon, P. Belluschi and A. E. Doyle and Associates. In and near Portland, Ore., they have built a number of houses, all with excellent plans, intimate relationship between interior and exterior, low-pitched spreading roofs, and, above all, sensitive understanding of their material — wood.

In Northeast Harbor, Maine, George Howe has designed a superb vacation house, all in wood and stone with double-pitched roofs and sliding glass doors used instead of windows. The house was built by local labor. In Highland Park, Ill., Schweiker & amp; Lamb have built an interesting house of brick and wood. Only the simple rectangular wall areas are of brick; the triangles formed by the shed roofs are filled in with wood, the more easily workable material.

Massachusetts has been slow to take up modern architecture, but can now show, especially in the region around Cambridge, some of the best work in the country. Particularly successful is the cinder-block and fieldstone Koch house, designed by Stone & Koch for a difficult corner lot in Cambridge. Another house which is contemporary in the best sense of the word is the house of wood and fieldstone which Marcel Breuer has designed for himself in Lincoln — a well-planned house which shows exceptionally fine feeling in its composition of volumes, textures and proportions.

California remains the most fertile ground for modern houses. Richard Neutra, Raphael Soriano, and, to some extent, Gregory Ain continue to turn out the well-rationalized, impeccable, but rather cold work for which they are famous. The work of Harwell Hamilton Harris is much warmer and more personal; much less European in inspiration, his fine wooden houses have a lyric quality which makes them comparable with the work of Frank Lloyd Wright.

New and experimental types of wood construction are featured in many otherwise undistinguished small houses. The John B. Pierce Foundation has built an experimental house at Lebanon, N. J., with widely spaced supporting posts braced by horizontal ribbon members. These horizontal strips form windowsills and heads into which light-weight prefabricated plywood panels and horizontally sliding sash are set to complete the exterior walls. Much publicity was accorded the very inexpensive plywood houses designed by the Federal Housing Administration for Fort Wayne. On a concrete floor slab are set up prefabricated panels of plywood, framed and insulated. No separate house-frame is required, and WPA workers can erect a house in less than two hours.

A new building by Frank Lloyd Wright is always a major architectural event. This year it was his Suntop Homes in Ardmore, near Philadelphia. The squarish building is subdivided by cross-shaped brick party walls into four separate houses, each three stories high. The houses are ingeniously constructed with various levels to give direct ventilation and light even to the rooms at the inner angle of each 90 degree wedge. Great cantilevered terraces are sheltered by half-high walls built up of horizontal cypress boarding. These houses have been so successful that others like them are being built.

Another new Frank Lloyd Wright house of special interest is the Johnson House near Racine, Wis. In this cross-shaped building Wright pushes his principle of plan articulation almost to the point of incoherence.

Apartments and Housing Projects.

The most spectacular example of the influence of advanced architectural theory on ordinary speculative building is to be found in New York's new Castle Village, a group of apartment houses designed by George F. Pelham, Jr., for a magnificent site just north of the George Washington Bridge. The five cross-shaped free-standing towers are designed to provide 90 per cent of the apartments with a view of the Hudson and the Palisades. The vertical concentration of dwellings and the avoidance of unnecessary streets means that 80 per cent of the site is left free for lawns and playgrounds. From a distance the buildings look bold and handsome, but at closer view the clarity of outline is lost in the inconsistency of the shaved-off corners, the mullioned windows, and the Georgian surface-treatment of the lower floors.

In its larger field the United States Housing Authority is beginning to turn out fine work. Their low-cost government-aided projects are in each case designed by architects commissioned by the local housing authorities; but Washington, in order to safeguard its investment, has set up certain minimum standards and offers technical advice of all kinds.

Queensbridge is the first USHA housing project to be completed in New York. Instead of using the usual T, H or U plans, the architects have designed Y-shaped buildings which open widely to sun and view and give a greater feeling of spaciousness than the more conventional lay-outs. Construction is now started on Branch Village, a USHA Negro-housing project at Camden, N. J. With its parallel rows of cleanly rectangular buildings and its handsome community center, it will certainly be one of the most attractive and modern projects in this country.

The generally recognized technical excellence of the USHA projects is too rarely matched by comparable excellence of architectural design. The first indication that the USHA may be planning the educational program which the architects themselves need almost as much as the public was the exhibition of 'Houses and Housing' which the USHA assembled this year in collaboration with the Museum of Modern Art in New York. This exhibition stressed architectural design rather than economic and social aspects of housing, and showed examples of well-designed projects both here and abroad. Shown in New York in the summer of 1939 the exhibition is now on tour, and will be on view in many large cities all over the country.

Schools and Community Centers.

There is a growing realization of the need for community centers to serve the social and cultural needs of our rural population. In farming country not far from Phoenixville, Pa., Oscar Stonorov has built the Charlestown Playhouse for adults as well as for children of pre-school and school age. In spite of the necessity for rigid economy, the architect succeeded in producing a very attractive building in stuccoed fieldstone and vertical redwood siding over a standard wood frame.

Notable exceptions to the prevalent mediocrity in the very important field of school-design are two new schools in California, both designed by the architects, Franklin and Kump. One is a pavilion-type elementary school in Fowler with an outdoor auditorium and outdoor corridors connecting the classrooms. Each classroom is separated only by a movable glass wall from an outdoor hedge-sheltered terrace for fair-weather use. The other is the Sierra Union High School, designed with emphasis on structural flexibility for earthquake protection and on sun control, achieved by two-foot roof overhangs with built-in drop shades.

Commercial Buildings.

Nowhere is modern design more generally accepted than in shops and restaurants. Designers of new small shops on Fifth Avenue in New York, for instance, have been quick to make use of such features as continuous bands of show-window, uninterrupted by structural members, 'invisible glass' show cases, and the spectacular new frameless doors of tempered plate glass. In new restaurants show-windows tend to be subordinated while entrances are emphasized by color, light, and contrasting materials. A modern vernacular style, direct and unpretentious, is beginning to appear not only in our industrial structures, but in milk-bars, shops, cafeterias, etc., all over the country.

The skyscraper, that peculiarly American contribution to architecture, seems definitely on the way out, and one doubts whether its loss will be regretted. Rockefeller Center in New York has been the only important skyscraper project since the depression. The latest addition to Rockefeller Center is the Holland Building by Reinhard & Hofmeister, Harrison & Fouilhoux. Externally this building resembles the others of the group, but internally it is quite different. The owners of Rockefeller Center were wise not to insist on identical treatment for all interiors; instead, there is marked progress in design from the gloomy splendor of the RCA Building to the gayer, more truly modern lobbies and elevators of the newest buildings.

Theaters and Museums.

Interest in modern theater design was stimulated by the National Theater Competition for a 'festival theater and fine arts building' at the College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Va. First prize went to Eero Saarinen, Ralph Rapson and Frederic James, all of Cranbrook Academy in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan.

In Boston is the tiny but very distinguished Telepix Newsreel Theater, designed by Marc Peter, Jr., and Hugh Stubbins. By intelligent use of color, and by accentuation of planes, the architects succeeded in enlarging the apparent volume. The seating arrangement in the auditorium is mechanically ingenious and also superbly comfortable.

The most important competition of recent years was held in the spring of 1939 for the design of a new building for the Smithsonian Gallery of Art in Washington, D. C. A thoroughly modern building was required which could yet take its place with the classicistic marble giants on the Mall. A distinguished jury awarded first prize to the dignified, clearly composed project submitted by Eliel and Eero Saarinen; second prize went to Percival Goodman of New York. An important precedent was set for the allotment of all public work on the democratic basis of open competition.

The latest theories of museum design became concrete with the completion this year of the new building for the Museum of Modern Art in New York, Philip L. Goodwin and Edward D. Stone were the architects. Since the floors are supported by an internal steel skeleton, walls are free for extensive use of different types of glass and movable partitions can be used to provide utmost flexibility in gallery space-subdivision. With its imposing glass and marble facades, the free and graceful curve of its entrance canopy, and the final accent of its hole-pierced penthouse roof-overhang, this building is considered by many critics as the handsomest modern building in New York.

Industrial Plants.

The trend in factory design is toward concentration of processing activities in vast undifferentiated sheds planned for a maximum of flexibility. Internal supports are avoided, and unvaried over-all lighting is usually obtained by a regular system of skylights. Albert Kahn of Detroit remains the most productive as well as the most successful factory designer; his new Dodge Half-Ton Truck Plant in Detroit is particularly fine.

Some of the most impressive semi-industrial work of our times has been turned out by the TVA during the past six years. These power-houses and related structures are built simply and solidly in reinforced concrete, with excellent detail and exciting use of color. They stand in strange contrast to the groups of fussy little houses which TVA has built for its employees.

Exhibitions.

There has been a number of interesting architectural exhibitions during the year. Henry-Russell Hitchcock, Jr., assembled a comprehensive show of Rhode Island architecture, from colonial times up to the present, for the Rhode Island School of Design in Providence; and the work of Mies van der Rohe (famous German architect now teaching at Armour Institute) was presented in an exhibition at the Chicago Art Institute and elsewhere. The exhibition of 'Houses and Housing' assembled by the Museum of Modern Art and the USHA has already been mentioned. Anyone who seriously made the rounds of domestic and foreign fair pavilions at either San Francisco or New York could learn much about architecture, housing and city-planning, past and present. For most of the non-industrial pavilions boasted exhibitions of enlarged photographs and scale-models, sometimes even accompanied by films.

England.

Since September, 1939, there has been little non-military building in Europe. The possible effect of military design on the architecture of peace was the subject of a series of articles edited by Douglas Haskell which appeared in the Architectural Record early in the year. The conclusion drawn at that date was that military design had not yet resulted in any civilly useful new materials or construction methods, equipments or services, plans or building types. The excessive factor of safety demanded of military structures is in itself contrary to the spirit of good, really modern construction.

The desire for air-raid protection does, of course, lead to decentralization, long a desideratum of civil planning; but for best air-raid protection the new centers should be attenuated and dispersed, not integrated in new nuclei as in the best modern town-planning practice. Satisfactory, however, from the military as well as from the civil viewpoint, are site plans of low density, with widely spaced and open-ended rows of parallel buildings.

In England the war interrupted an interesting period of transition in architecture. First, modern architecture showed signs of becoming something more fundamental and widespread than the snob style which it had so far been. Although speculative one-family houses remained shoddily pretentious, the new apartment houses, particularly in London, were without stylistic tags, straightforward and decent, though undistinguished. Second, in the work of the recognized architectural leaders there were evident, and to an even greater degree, the same tendencies which characterize the most advanced American architecture: new interest in materials and their appropriate use and a new, freer, and more dynamic planning technique. The flat stucco surfaces formerly so characteristic of English modern work are now abandoned for glazed tile, natural stone, and brick — materials rich in texture and unaffected by the grimy air of the city. Even wood, expensive as it is in England, has become a favorite material for country use.

Two of the most important new buildings in London were designed by Tecton: a new apartment house in Highpoint, and the Finsbury Health Center, gleaming dramatically in one of the worst slum sections of the city. For this same section Tecton has designed two freshly conceived housing projects, but the war may interfere with their execution.

The distinguished block of inter-locking duplex apartments which Wells Coates designed for Palace Gate, London, is a very successful example of the architect's system of 'three-dimensional planning.' The elevator need stop only at every third floor.

The rural college movement for adult education, started in Cambridge by Henry Morris, may well be encouraged by the war. The evacuation of urban populations will make rural centers like these immensely valuable.

Other Countries.

With the inactivity of her most distinguished architect, LeCorbusier, now reported to be devoting all his time to painting, France has lost her pre-eminence in modern architecture. Some of the best work is now being done by Beaudouin & Lods, who continue their experiments with flexible standardized construction of prefabricated steel units. In this field their combined community house and open-air market at Clichy is definitely a technical achievement.

Italy is in the peculiar position of producing many of the worst, as well as some of the best buildings of our time. Few countries can show such a masterpiece as the tuberculosis clinic designed by I. Gardella and L. Martini and built by the province of Alexandria. Within the limits of a rectangular prism the architects have worked with rare imagination, yet without sacrifice of efficiency and economy. Especially marked is their sensitive treatment of materials. Among the many new vacation colonies for Fascist youth organizations is the splendid 'Sandro Mussolini' colony by the sea at Cesenatico.

The Italians are the best exhibition-designers in the world. The freshness, lightness, variety, and utter rightness of the installation designed by a group of architects for last summer's Leonardo exhibition in Milan makes even the best examples of exhibition technique in the New York or San Francisco Fairs seem heavy-handed.

A major architectural event of the year was the Swiss National Exhibition in Zurich. The buildings were disposed on both sides of the Lake of Zurich to take full advantage of the magnificent site. A charming feature was the 'Schifflibach,' a narrow artificial stream with sufficient current to carry small boatloads of visitors. The stream wound slowly through the exhibition-halls themselves. Such imaginative use of water was sadly lacking in the American expositions. The pavilions themselves opened freely to the outside and were almost without exception light, gay and frankly temporary in construction. The architectural masterpiece was an elliptical concrete vault designed by the famous Swiss engineer, Robert Maillart. Almost fifty feet high, this concrete shell was only six centimeters (2.36') thick — a daring construction of amazing elegance.

German architecture is notable today for its pompous, heavily classic public buildings. Even those few architects of first rank who have remained in the country seem unable to produce work of any real quality.

The classicism and heavy monumentality of Russian architecture seems incongruous in a supposedly proletarian society. Yet it is reported that the choice of the classic style was uncontestably the will of the people. Huge Corinthian columns are disposed over factory facades and immense towers for symmetry and civic grandeur are erected.

No countries have developed a better modern vernacular style than the Scandinavian countries. This is especially true of Sweden, where the powerful cooperatives have exerted an admirable influence on contemporary architecture.

Finland boasts the more individual talents of Alvar and Aino Aalto, architects of the Finnish Pavilion in New York. Their Sunila factory-community, the most important wood-pulp panel plant in the world, points out the possibility of a new and more humanly desirable pattern for industrial life. But it is in the Gullichsen House near Pori that the architects' personal idiom finds full expression. Its open flexible plan and its imaginative yet direct use of natural materials, even its very restlessness, make it one of the most characteristic and yet outstanding monuments of contemporary architecture.

1938: Architecture

1938: Architecture

American architecture was interesting in 1938 not so much for any high level of design as for the vigor evidenced by the encouragingly large number of modern buildings and their variety of conception and form. The spurious variety of our century of eclecticism is slowly being supplanted by the honestly differentiated forms of a truly modern architecture. The essential individuality of a building is based on thoughtful and sensitive consideration of function, regional requirements, materials, and construction, and can only be obscured by the application of borrowed styles, ancient or modern.

Stylistic borrowings are not always immediately recognizable as such. Symmetry is a classic ideal, justifiable today only if it be the logical solution to plan requirements. Massive monumentality is rarely warranted by contemporary materials and construction methods, and represents a way of thinking essentially foreign to a modern democracy. Windows cut through a facade like holes-in-the-wall are appropriate only to solid masonry construction. All these borrowed elements characterize the administration buildings which front Albert Kahn's otherwise beautifully straightforward factories. Other formulae are often borrowed without discrimination from Continental modernism: unsuitable use of corner windows, glass brick, 'lally' columns, flat roofs and white stucco.

American Houses.

The legitimate variety of expression possible in contemporary architecture is best illustrated by modern American houses. Interest in machine methods, prefabrication, standardization of building elements and procedure, and experiment with new building materials and techniques are for many architects closely allied with study of orientation, with increased use of natural materials, and with emphasis on intimate relationship between site and house, between nature and the work of man.

The recent work of Frank Lloyd Wright illustrates all these tendencies. Availing himself whenever possible of machine methods of production, Wright has yet gone further than any other architect in the humanization of architecture. His country house for E. J. Kaufmann on Bear Run, Pa., is certainly one of the most important buildings of our times. Great slabs of reinforced concrete are spectacularly cantilevered out over a ravine to make several terraces over and above the stream. Supporting the terraces, and contrasting with their airiness, is the heavy house-core, built up of native stone. Solid masonry for support, reinforced concrete for light horizontals — the materials are appropriately used. A lyric conception of architecture as related to its natural setting, the house is also a perfect example of form developed imaginatively and consequently from materials, construction, and purpose. Of a character more closely resembling his earlier work is the one-story house designed by Wright for Herbert Jacobs at Madison, Wis. To keep the cost within the $5,500 limit, the architect eliminated every unnecessary material in construction. Pitched roofs were considered expensive and unnecessary, and a sheltered carport took the place of a garage. The house is heated exclusively by its steam-warmed concrete floor-slab. Walls are formed of three thicknesses of boards screwed together with building paper between. These slab walls, the same inside as out, were assembled on the site, but would be well adapted to factory prefabrication.

Richard Neutra of Los Angeles represents a different tendency in architecture. Pioneer and preeminent experimentalist with modern synthetic building materials and rationalized building technique, he is an important figure in American architecture. To some critics, the ascetic purity of Neutra's precisely calculated houses more than compensates for their lack of warmth, of intuitive unity of design. Neutra is close to the strictest German 'functionalism' of the twenties, and his houses are more nearly 'machines for living in' than anything ever produced by LeCorbusier himself. One of Neutra's few buildings in the East is the Brown house, recently completed on Fisher's Island, N.Y. The distance between the widely spaced studs of the wood frame was used as a unit in the design of doors and windows. Elasticity of construction is evidenced by the manner in which the house stood up under the September hurricane. The house is surfaced with aluminum paint which, by reflecting the sun's rays, not only helps to insulate against their heat, but makes the house seem to disappear in the landscape.

The work of most American architects lies intermediate between that of the poet Wright and the technician Neutra. William Lescaze has designed an interesting house in Tuxedo Park, N.Y., for a client who wished a home that would also serve as an experimental laboratory for his hobby, air conditioning. The problem of insulation and control was solved by a one-story 'house-within a house,' an outer wall of steel frame and masonry separated by a two-foot corridor from an inner shell of wood. In spite of the novelty of its problem, this house is in many ways the best that Lescaze has produced in years.

On a small south-facing corner lot in Cambridge, Mass., Edward Stone and Carl Koch, Jr., have designed a house notable for its satisfactory combination of various materials as well as for its ingenious solution to a difficult site problem. The house faces the street, but is sheltered from it by a courtyard enclosed by a fieldstone wall. Reinforced concrete is used dramatically, but suitably, in Alexander Levy's cliff-top house for Richard Halliburton in California.

Wood as a Building Material.

Architects are particularly interested now in finding new uses for wood, the traditional American building material. The freshly conceived California houses of Harwell Hamilton Harris show a particularly imaginative and sensitive use of this material. Less personal in feeling are the two standard-frame wood houses recently designed by Walter Gropius and Marcel Breuer in Massachusetts, one at Lincoln and one at Cohasset. The Cohasset house is ingeniously planned to combine clapboards and natural stone.

Clapboards have been unprecedentedly popular this year with architects who previously have preferred to use flat surfacing materials. Kenneth Kassler's use of narrow, untreated, natural cypress siding in the Starks House, Princeton, N.J., is particularly successful.

Much less sophisticated are the straightforward, region-conscious wood houses springing up all over the country. Usually conventionally framed, with simple low-pitched roofs, they boast modern open plans and modern fenestration. Traditional in spirit, though not in form, at their best they have the anonymous charm and livability of folk-architecture. Even the most conservative architects and builders are being forced by popular demand to consider such elementary principles of modern architecture as proper orientation and site-use, open planning, and large wall-openings. For reasons of economy rather than esthetics, less use is being made of applied ornament.

The new possibilities of plywood as a building material are being thoroughly explored. Development by the Forest Products Laboratory in Madison, Wis., of weatherproof resin-binding makes possible external as well as internal use of plywood. It is used in three main ways: (1) as panels applied inside and outside to conventional wood stud framing; (2) in large pre-fabricated slabs (two sheets of plywood separated by insulating material and lightly framed for stiffening) placed between widely spaced wood framing members, as in the Resettlement Administration's experimental house at Greenbelt, Md.; and (3) in large prefabricated units similar to those of (2) but designed for direct assembly without a supporting frame, as in the Forest Products Laboratory experimental houses, which use the prefabricated panels for floors and roofs as well as for walls.

Types of Houses.

Houses in various price ranges were designed for Life by eight prominent architects — four traditional, four modern. The lack of any one outstanding project may be partly accounted for by the short time allowed for their design. Of those Life readers who expressed their preference, 45 per cent voted for modern; and the Frank Lloyd Wright project, impractical though it was, led in popularity. Another project which has received wide publicity is Paul Nelson's model for a 'Suspended House,' an experiment in new use of space. Rooms of continuous metal sheeting, appropriately curved, are suspended at various levels from two elegant tubular metal arches, and hang freely within a tremendous air-conditioned glass shell. In form, the project is readily comparable with modern painting and sculpture.

Large-scale Housing Projects.

Economically and socially, though not at the present time architecturally, more important than the individual house is large-scale housing. In November the United States Housing Authority celebrated the first anniversary of its activity in providing low-rent housing for workers earning between $500 and $1,100. Almost all of the available $800,000,000 (Congress allowed the Authority an additional $300,000,000 this year) has been allocated to local housing authorities, and many projects have been completed. Under the present program, 150,000 homes will be built and an equal number of slum dwellings demolished. The fact that construction costs are proving to be lower than had been expected means that rents can be lower and more units built than was at first thought possible. An outstanding example of the economy which results from efficient planning and administration is Red Hook Houses in Brooklyn, which will cost 25 per cent less than the $16,000,000 allotted for construction.

Contributing to lower costs has been labor's agreement not to strike during the construction of a project against wage scales accepted at the beginning. There is some hope that a system of guaranteed annual wages can be set up in connection with large-scale building operations, although the difficulties encountered by such a plan are almost prohibitive.

Since maintenance costs account for a large proportion of the annual costs which must be met by rent, the Housing Authority is encouraging the construction of one-family houses with individual gardens.

Housing projects under the USHA are architecturally similar to those of its predecessor, the PWA. In the typical site plan, buildings of complicated shape form a series of small courts with dreary absence of any real clarity of form and complete disregard for orientation. With the not always justifiable excuse of economy, glass areas are limited, unfriendly materials used in unsuitable ways, and balconies made the exception rather than the rule. The atmosphere of gaiety which European architects have often achieved in similar low-cost housing is here sadly lacking. Exceptions to the general mediocrity are the excellent site-use and clear-cut forms of Westfield Acres, Camden, N.J.; Lakeview Terrace, Cleveland, O.; and the new projects in Puerto Rico and Hawaii.

The precedent set by these housing projects for future building, public and private, makes the question of architectural standards doubly important. (See also HOUSING: Government Projects.)

'Greenbelt' Extra-urban Projects.

Unlike the PWA and USHA projects, which try to solve the housing problem within the framework of existing cities, the 'Greenbelt' communities of the Resettlement Administration (now the Farm Security Administration) are entirely new and self-contained towns. Each is a satellite of a larger city, but protected from it by a permanent green belt of farmland. Each was designed as a unit, with its own schools, shops, and community center. Of the three recently completed communities, the best planned and handsomest is Greenbelt, Md. The 'Greenbelt' idea offers a new pattern for living which deserves serious consideration by the public.

Medium-rental Projects.

In all probability we will soon see a great amount of large-scale housing designed to rent at prices between those of government-subsidized projects and what has been regarded as minimum for private enterprise. First to see the possibilities for investment in this field was the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, which has announced a $50,000,000 low-rent project for a 120-acre site in the Bronx, N.Y.

Another attempt to reach this neglected group of people is Gerard B. Lambert's housing plan. Tried out on a microcosmic scale in Princeton, N.J., it has received favorable publicity. According to the Architectural Forum (December, 1938), the plan calls for the establishment of 'investment housing corporations,' which 'would sell securities to the public, build housing projects with the proceeds, manage and maintain the projects until they have paid for themselves. At such a time, projects would be turned over to the municipality.' In return, the municipality would waive taxes on the projects. Interest on securities would be limited to 4 per cent.

Housing for Those on Relief.

Since people on relief are barred from government housing, the problem of housing them decently and economically is acute. To this end, Fort Wayne, Ind., has developed an ingenious scheme. Idle land, held privately on speculation, is rented by the city for one dollar a year (freedom from taxes naturally included). On this land are erected small semi-portable plywood houses modeled after the Purdue University experimental houses. Phenomenally low rents are being achieved under this plan.

Institutional and Industrial Buildings.

While college and preparatory school buildings remain Tudor or Georgian, public schools are taking the lead in more objective and appropriate design. The new high school at Ansonia, Conn., by William Lescaze and Vernon Sears is particularly good. Here the three main elements — classrooms, auditorium, and gymnasium — are clearly articulated and brought without the artifice of symmetry into a logical, rhythmic arrangement. The trend toward incorporation of adult recreation facilities with those for elementary education is well illustrated by Alfred Kastner's starkly simple new school for Jersey Homesteads, the Resettlement Administration community near Hightstown, N.J.

One of the most interesting buildings of the year is the home for crippled children on the beach at Lewes, Del. The architects, Victorine and Samuel Homsey, have avoided the clichés of modern architecture and produced an efficient solution which is also both gay and original.

Perhaps it is because the public has never thought of factories as 'Architecture' that such a high level of design prevails in this field. The client is rarely interested in monumentality, quaintness, or academic verisimilitude; he merely desires a building that will be efficient, flexible, economical, and perhaps handsome. As a result, our factories are directly and boldly conceived, with frank, often even imaginative use of modern materials. Many methods of construction first developed in factory design have later been taken over into general use. For example, factories pioneered with the use of an internal system of columns as support for floors and roof: all weight is thus removed from exterior walls, which can be entirely of glass.

While Albert Kahn, Inc., America's most prolific factory designer, turns out consistently interesting work, the most distinguished industrial building of the year is certainly the Administration Building designed by Frank Lloyd Wright for the Johnson Wax Company at Racine, Wis. The building is supported by incredibly slender 'dendriform' columns of concrete reinforced with steel mesh. These columns taper down almost to a point at the base. Adapted from the 'mushroom' columns developed some years ago, they are as technically successful as they are architecturally gratifying.

Public Buildings.

Our public buildings present a very different picture. They slowly become more simple, but it is the superficial simplicity of rectangular moldings and squared columns rather than the basic simplicity which results from straightforward design. The stripped classicism of Paul Cret's Federal Reserve Board Building in Washington is far removed from any vigorous current in contemporary architecture. But the purest monuments to 'conspicuous waste' have come from the office of the late John Russell Pope: the new Mellon Gallery in Washington and the Jefferson Memorial, which, in spite of well-organized and articulate opposition, will be erected on the Washington Tidal Basin.

Prize-winning designs in the Government post-office competition were largely in the 'Government classic' style of the Federal Reserve Board Building. This competition was important for the precedent it may establish for the allotment of all Federal work on the democratic basis of open, anonymous competition.

Most interest, public as well as professional, was attracted by the competition, sponsored by the Museum of Modern Art and the Architectural Forum, for an Art Center for Wheaton College, Norton, Mass. This was the first major competition in this country in which preference for modern design was expressed in the program.

Various Events of Interest to Architecture.

Public interest in housing was stimulated by the production of 'One Third of a Nation' by the Living Newspaper and the Federal Theaters of New York and Philadelphia. Based on the theme 'a man's got to have a place to live . . . ' the play offered a dramatic interpretation of the evils of land speculation and the resultant necessity for government assistance in providing housing for the lowest-third income group.

Major exhibitions of architecture organized this year by the Museum of Modern Art, New York, and circulated by them all over the country featured Frank Lloyd Wright's Kaufmann House, the architecture and furniture of the Finn, Alvar Aalto, and the early work of the Bauhaus, an internationally important post-war German school of art and architecture. The exhibition of 'Three Centuries of American Art' assembled by the Museum of Modern Art for the Jeu de Paume Museum in Paris included a large section on American architecture, past and present. The present trend toward modern architecture was endorsed by the architectural magazine this year as never before. The December number of the Architectural Forum included Plus, a progressive and ultra-modern department of the magazine, separately edited and appearing every second month. Another event was the reappearance of Shelter as 'a correlating medium for housing progress.'

As the situation abroad becomes intolerable, many of Europe's most distinguished architects are coming to this country. With Mies van der Rohe and Hilbersheimer teaching at Armour Institute, Walter Gropius and Marcel Bretter at Harvard, American architectural education should benefit from foreign misfortune.

Great Britain.

England was slow to take up modern architecture, but now shows a vitality equal to that of any country on the Continent. Most consistently interesting work is that of Tecton, a group of young architects internationally famous for their imaginative zoo buildings.

There is no better illustration of the development within modern architecture during the past few years than Tecton's two apartment houses at Highgate, London. The first unit, completed in 1935, has a cubistic, impersonal boxiness, emphasized by a flat surface treatment and a non-committal coating of white stucco. The second building, just completed, contrasts with the first in its conscious richness of form and texture. Arranged like the first unit, it has a similar concrete skeleton with bearing walls at both ends, but here the end walls are faced with cream-colored glazed tiles, divided into panels. The concrete frame is exposed on the two long walls and filled in alternately with glass and white-pointed black brick.

In dynamic contrast to the static mass of the building, the entrance canopy forms a free curve. It is supported by concrete casts of the famous Erectheon cariatids — a precious detail of dubious validity. The flow of space between interior and exterior is emphasized by the extension of the garden into the entrance hall itself.

This second Highpoint illustrates important tendencies in contemporary architecture: structure of emphatic lightness and refinement, obliques and free curves used as contrast to more rigid outlines, and increased interest in texture and variety of materials. Pushed to the limit, the result is a kind of modern baroque, flexible and dynamic.

Since English school authorities like the directness and flexibility of modern planning, many commissions are going to the younger architects. They are designing pavilion-type schools, low and rambling, with each classroom intimately related to the outdoors. The exhibition of modern schools which was circulated about England by the Royal Institute of British Architects has done much to stimulate public interest in proper school design.

Of particular importance was the large exhibition of architecture and urbanism which the MARS group organized in London. Concise and dramatic, it was a masterpiece of modern exhibition technique.

The 1938 British Empire Exhibition at Glasgow was interesting chiefly for the consistency of design achieved by standardization of (1) materials and construction (steel or wood frame covered with asbestos-cement sheets), (2) sizes of parts, and (3) basic design of the smaller buildings. Such standardization makes for economy and speed of erection and provides a certain unity of appearance, but it must often be felt as restriction by the individual architect. Unity easily degenerates into monotony.

The gayest building of the Glasgow Exhibition was the 'tree-top' restaurant by Tait and Ross. Rather than cut down the many trees on the site, the architects simply raised the building on steel columns set among the trees and included the upper branches within the restaurant.

France.

France offers little this year to compare in architectural interest with the 1937 Paris Exposition. Still among the most active architects is the pioneer modernist, Auguste Perret. His new Museum of Public Works in Paris is typical of his personal idiom in concrete. In spite of its classic conception, the building achieves integrity and interest through the emphasis accorded its exposed frame of reinforced concrete, through the use of pre-cast concrete slabs to fill in the voids between the structural members, and through the sharply defined, simple profiles of the protruding door and window frames. The recently completed Louis Pasteur Hospital at Colmar, although ostensibly designed by W. Vetter with Perret only as consultant, also bears the unmistakable Perret stamp.

LeCorbusier, most distinguished French architect, seems to have been comparatively inactive this year; but his influence is obvious in the subtle façade treatment of the excellent Paris apartment house designed by Jean Ginsberg and François Heep.

Scandinavia.

Scandinavian architecture, though rarely inspired, continues to be straightforward, livable, and thoroughly modern. The freshest, best-considered work is being turned out by the Finn, Alvar Aalto, internationally recognized as one of the master-builders of our times. Few architects anywhere can equal his imaginative use of wood in bent-wood furniture and in the Finnish Pavilion at the 1937 Paris Exposition. This sensitivity to the qualities of materials is coupled with a refreshingly human approach to the problems of architecture. He now has two large projects under construction: a group of low-rent apartment houses at Munkkiniemi, and a self-contained industrial community at Sunila.

Switzerland.

As in Scandinavia, architecture in Switzerland is non-traditional as a matter of course. (The new Art Museum in Basle by Rudolf Christ and Paul Bonatz is notable as the single important exception.) Swiss solutions to the growing demand for urban outdoor swimming pools combined with restaurants and other facilities for recreation deserve serious study in this country. Architects are now busy with plans for the National Exhibition to be held at Zurich in the summer of 1939.

Palestine.

While modern architecture is an established fact in almost every country of Europe, nowhere has it found more enthusiastic general acceptance than in the rapidly developed Jewish communities of Palestine. Buildings of real architectural merit are, however, scarce. The prevalent use of reinforced concrete framework with brick fill is due to the high cost of Jewish labor and the resulting tendency toward mechanization and economy of material. Excessive land costs have already resulted in over-crowded housing and a scarcity of low-rent urban quarters. Huge housing projects are being planned for the cheap land surrounding the towns.

Italy.

Although Italian public buildings tend to retain the heavy symmetry, though not the elaborate detail, of the classic tradition, delicate, beautifully proportioned, thoroughly modern buildings are going up all over the country. Much use is made of concrete framework, and the more elaborate buildings are richly surfaced with thin slabs of travertine or marble. The elegant simplicity which can result is illustrated by the work of Giancarlo Palanti in Leghorn, although Luigi Moretti's fencing academy on the Forum Mussolini is the most distinguished example to date. Great glass areas are prevalent, but are protected from the hot Italian sun by projecting terraces or roof-slabs.

G. Mucchi's project for a fountain in Milan shows that the national genius for fountain design did not die with the Baroque period. Mucchi has combined sculpture, water, and curved, free-standing marble walls in a large and masterful composition.

Contemporary Italian achievements in city-planning include the cities on the former Pontine Marshes, the new mountain resorts in Aosta, and the interesting group of tall, widely spaced apartment houses now going up on the Genoa water-front.

Other Countries.

It is curious that the two other great totalitarian countries should have a conception of architecture so completely different from that of Italy. Both Germany and Russia hold that the primary function of architecture is to express the power of the state. For this purpose the most ponderous forms of classicism are aptly chosen. In spirit there is little difference between the Byzantine classicism of the 1938 All-Union Agricultural Exposition at Moscow and Albert Speer's buildings for the Nazi rallies at Nuremberg. But there is strong evidence in both countries that architects are growing restless under these restrictions.

Both Austria and Czechoslovakia have long been accustomed to a vigorous, unselfconscious, untraditional architecture. Only partly completed is the great Austrian State Tobacco Factory at Linz by Peter Behrens and Alexander Popp. Faintly expressionistic in style, it is yet a distinguished treatment of utilitarian forms. Czechoslovakia's most notable recent buildings have been schools and sanatoria — in particular the beautifully simple Sanatorium Masaryk by Tibra and Kan. What result German domination will have on the architecture of these countries is a matter for conjecture.

International Pavilions at New York World's Fair.

The international pavilions at the New York World's Fair in 1930 will offer an opportunity for first-hand investigation of what is happening in architecture all over the world. The peculiar interest of exhibition buildings frequently lies in their use of advanced ideas which only later pass into the normal architectural vocabulary. The kind of showing we ourselves will make is not yet fully apparent — one can still hope that the majority of the buildings will be light, gay, open, and frankly temporary.